[hipl-dev] Re: binary packaging
- From: René Hummen <rene.hummen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: hipl-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:49:36 +0100
On 05.11.2010, at 14:53, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 07:57:50PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
>> [...]
>
> I'd like to move this issue forward.
+1
> The single monolithic package idea
> does not have many fans, but the current split is too complex.
> So how about packages for
>
> - 'hipd' (including hipconf)
> - 'hipfw'
> - 'dnsproxy'
What are the dependencies for the DNS proxy? Does it run only in combination
with hipd or (hipd and hipfw). If it's only dependency is hipd, I suggest
moving it to hipd package.
> - 'common' (including docs and shared libs)
Do we use shared libs? If no, drop them and rename this package to doc.
> - 'all' (virtual package)
>
> This eliminates the 'minimal', 'lib' 'tools' and 'docs' packages.
>
> The pisacert and nsupdate.pl programs could either go in common or
> be left out. I'm currently unsure how essential they are.
Both only are of interest in combination with hipd. Move them there, please.
--
Dipl.-Inform. Rene Hummen, Ph.D. Student
Chair of Communication and Distributed Systems
RWTH Aachen University, Germany
tel: +49 241 80 20772
web: http://ds.rwth-aachen.de/members/hummen
Other related posts:
