Hi, On 11/05/2010 07:17 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 07:01:32PM +0200, Miika Komu wrote:On 11/05/2010 03:36 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 05:11:31PM +0300, Miika Komu wrote:On 10/27/2010 01:51 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:What's with the top-posting all of a sudden? On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:30:23PM +0300, Miika Komu wrote:On 26/10/10 20:57, Diego Biurrun wrote:This thing is supposed to be infrastructure software that touches every single packet passing through a machine. For that it needs to become ultrafast and very reliable. At the moment it is neither.Not really all packets, just the HIP-related ones. Ultrafast and reliable calls for testing and performance optimization, not just polishing the code base.Precisely my point, HIPL still has a long way to go there. Let's not forget that it dabbles in cryptography, a field where it is frightfully easy to make important mistakes.please elaborate? What is wrong with the crypto in HIPL?Hopefully nothing, but I would not bet :)
while I think it would nice to have e.g. a static analysis on HIPL code, I would suggest to keep such remarks to yourself until you have something solid to point at. You have bad habit of seeing the devil everywhere you go >)