[hipl-dev] Re: binary packaging
- From: Diego Biurrun <diego@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: hipl-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 17:35:19 +0100
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 03:49:36PM +0100, René Hummen wrote:
> On 05.11.2010, at 14:53, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 07:57:50PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> >> [...]
> >
> > The single monolithic package idea
> > does not have many fans, but the current split is too complex.
> > So how about packages for
> >
> > - 'common' (including docs and shared libs)
>
> Do we use shared libs? If no, drop them and rename this package to doc.
No, we use static libs by default. I will remove the libs.
> > - 'all' (virtual package)
> >
> > This eliminates the 'minimal', 'lib' 'tools' and 'docs' packages.
> >
> > The pisacert and nsupdate.pl programs could either go in common or
> > be left out. I'm currently unsure how essential they are.
>
> Both only are of interest in combination with hipd. Move them there, please.
Done.
I'm implementing all of this in the 'packaging' branch on launchpad.
Diego
Other related posts:
