Hi, On 11/10/2010 07:24 PM, Diego Biurrun wrote:
On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 07:11:34PM +0200, Miika Komu wrote:In general, the packages called hipd, hipfw, dnsproxy, common and all sound fine to me. Are you going to prefix them with hipl (note that there's two other HIP implementations)?I haven't put much thought to it yet, I was going to keep the package names as-is, i.e. with prefix. If there are alternative implementations this is likely the most sensible route.
ok. Keeping the package name as it is will cause less problems.
