> Return-Path: <openbeos-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Received: from mel-rti18.wanadoo.fr (192.168.156.137) by ms32- > 2.wanadoo.fr; 17 Sep 2002 15:05:39 +0200 > Received: from turing.freelists.org (206.53.239.180) by mel- > rti18.wanadoo.fr (6.5.012) > id 3D80129A0072627B; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 15:05:39 +0200 > Received: from turing.(none) (localhost [127.0.0.1]) > by turing.freelists.org (FreeLists Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP > id 32B369491A; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 08:09:29 -0500 (EST) > Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list openbeos); Tue, 17 Sep 2002 > 08:09:29 -0500 (EST) > Delivered-To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Received: from carmine.bestweb.net (carmine.bestweb.net > [209.94.102.73]) > by turing.freelists.org (FreeLists Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id > B3078943C2 > for <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 08:09:28 -0500 (EST) > Received: from bestweb.net (unknown [209.94.102.71]) > by carmine.bestweb.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 0444522E2B > for <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 08:06:11 -0500 (EST) > From: "John M. Gabriele" <jandl@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 09:06:37 EST > Subject: [openbeos] Re: gcc 3.x ABI > X-Mailer: CWMail Web to Mail Gateway 2.7f, http://netwinsite.com/ > top_mail.htm > Message-id: <3d8728dd.10c19.0@xxxxxxxxxxx> > X-User-Info: 208.51.131.94 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > X-archive-position: 6474 > X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 > Sender: openbeos-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Errors-To: openbeos-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > X-original-sender: jandl@xxxxxxxxxxx > Precedence: normal > Reply-To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > X-list: openbeos > > >Hi the list, > > > > > >Since the gcc 3.X change its ABI, does it means gcc 3.0 will not be > >usable under BeOS R5. > > > >If this is the case, what need to be done for this version could run > > on > >BeOS R5. > > > >We have made some developments under Linux with this compiler and > >(binutils 2.13) and would like to port our stuff to BeOS. > > > >THX in advance. > > > >Thierry (BeFree) > > > > [[[and also]]] > > > >Hi, the list, > > > >Does anyone have infos about persons making or trying to make a port > > of > >binutils 2.13 and gcc 3 on BeOS (seems it needs mainly to make a > > port > >of glibc too) > > > >THX for repons > > > >Thierry (BeFree) > > > > Both of these messages are off-topic here. :) I'm not sure about what you mean ? ;-) Does the ml "openbeos" is not interest about the (future and specs of) tools use by the OS.BOS projects ? ;-) Thierry (BeFree)