I am not at all opposed to using 2.95.6 if someone wants to port it. I think that the newest (final? Did they stop supporting 2.95?) version of GCC2 is probably a good thing. I do want to hold the line on 3.0, at least until R1 is done. >I would want to use the latest 2.95 version and try to get the running. >The ABI converter between 2.95 and 3 might even be impossible to do (at >least there might be more than one way to demangle a symbol, so the >linker would need to help). > >Anyway, with the "fun" I already had with Be's gcc, I really think we >should switch to something newer, if possible (also MMX/3Dnow! support >would be a nice addition). > >But I also think it may make sense to wait with gcc 3 until we have R1 >done. > >Adios... > Axel. > > > >