En réponse à Michael Phipps <mphipps1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >I'm not sure about what you mean ? ;-) Does the ml "openbeos" is not > >interest about the (future and specs of) tools use by the OS.BOS > >projects ? > > > >;-) > > We are really trying to keep this list focused on today. Today's tools > and today's issues. > Always changing, the future is. Back a year ago, everyone thought that > we should go to gcc3.0, for example, because it was a new ABI and > certainly it wouldn't change any time in the near future. ;-) > > OTOH, this topic is appropriate for the kernel mailing list, since we > (Team Kernel) could and may well build with something newer than 2.95. > Since the Kernel Kit's API is C and not C++, we can get away with a lot > more. And the extra performance will help everyone. ;-) > Actually he explained me he was trying to explorer the possibility to use GRUB as a bootloader for OBOS, but found a bug in the objdump BeOs has, and so wanted to try a newer version. François.