[openbeos] Re: Post-mortems: a suggested method for continuous improvements
- From: "Michael Phipps" <mphipps1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 20:57:00 -0500
>
>> >Yes, but do you want Joe Q. Public non-dev running it now?
>>
>> Only if they are knowing targets.
>> If they *choose* to do so, then yes. If they know that it is beta type
>> code.
>
>If they 'choose' to do so we can point them to a testing area.
>The common man only knows headlines.
We can't be responsible for the headlines. NO ONE in the "press" came to me
or (AFAIK) to anyone else in leadership, for info.
>> Maybe not the average BeOS user. Maybe. But certainly the average Linux user
>> is very accustomed to that.
>> And since there is some level of crossover, it wouldn't surprise me.
>
>The average Linux user has compiler-toting OCD and extreme paranoia.
I don't even want to touch that. :-)
>> I think that posting the news is a good thing. Posting a link might well be
>> something else.
>
>A quick glance at OSNews.com "This first release" and link right to the
>tarball. To the average person "first release" == R1.
Eh. Even the New York Times makes mistakes and has retractions. :-)
Other related posts:
