Userfriendlyness comes down to intuitiveness and discoverability in the short run, and efficiency in the long run. Let's not forget that userfriendlyness-wise, Windows is pretty darn bad. The helpfull hints stop being given the moment you need them most. "Ask your network administrator for ..." I *AM* the network administrator! *grmbl* And how do you switch back certain settings? Why did this suddenly stop working? (A: accumulation of 'apps') Why can't I access my network-folder yet? And in the long run Windows is pretty tiring, because app-centric isn't really the best way to go about managing your data (such as emails, contacts, docs). Ronald Vos On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:50:35 +0100 CET, Mikael Jansson (mailing lists) <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Cian Duffy <myob87@xxxxxxxxx>: > > > > I think they way BeOS works now is in fact better in the long run. > > Forcing a slight learning curve will keep absolute idiots from > > clogging up the forums for all eternity with dumb questions ("Hay, I > > can't get on the net. Fix it for me!!", etc), but will leave the > > system usuable for nearly everyone else > > > While I understand what you mean, this interferes with our goal to take > over the world. Thus, we need to address the problem at hand - in fact, > doing this correctly will probably make questions like these > unneccessary! > > -- > Mikael Jansson > http://mikael.jansson.be > >