>> On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:43:00 +0100 CET, Jonas Sundström >> <jonas@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > I think it would be much better if the system could provide >> > the necessary uniformity, to keep everyone from rolling their own. >> > I would much rather have a good system-provided scanner dialog, >> > (with possible extensions, should they be necessary). > > Actually I got that idea recently, and, humm... Sorry, can't tell more yet > :p > Argh, don't talk about it then! :) > > Yes, BeHappy does that with NetPositive. > You just need to create a BMessage with the correct field and pass it to a > BShelf. > So what we need it to make the Replicant framework easier to use, and provide for higher-level mechanisms(sp?) for interaction between the container and the embedded app -- preferedly, the client (i.e., embedded) should have the Replicant stuff built-in as much as possible (I think the default API is a bit trickier than necessary), and that a way of exposing the methods supported by the client in a high-level definition language. We have most things in place for supporting a module-based (task-based, even!) environment, with the Application Kit and whatnot. OpenDoc Haiku-style :) -- tic