On 2011-06-05 at 00:28:02 [+0200], pete.goodeve@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > I think that mail nicely explains my frustration... (:-/) > > It cost me a *hell* of a lot more time than it cost you (many months > of often demoralizing debugging). The fact that a patch isn't "perfect" > or "complete" should not prevent it being committed, if the problem that it > addresses made the system many, many times *less* perfect! And alpha > Haiku is certainly not "perfect"... > > That you only "skimmed" the patch, and you *think* it has style violations > is not encouraging. If there are still violations, I will fix them [I > thought > I had]. I don't just *think* there are style violation, I *know* there are. My skimming through the patch has shown me that it isn't ready to be applied as is. I understand your frustration, but this whole discussion has probably cost me more time than to look into the issue myself. I feel that continuing like this is simply not a good investment of my time. I quite intentionally did not take ownership of the ticket, BTW. I currently don't have an environment to quickly test this. Even if I wanted to apply the patch I'd first have to set one up. I hope someone else feels more motivated than me. CU, Ingo