J=E9r=F4me Duval <korli@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I cannot believe you as I have my tests a a proof. ;-) > Looking at the code would theorically make me think Axel is right : > the buffer > size is always increased, not decreased. But as flushs are done on a > hard > watermark, your tests shouldn't show increased latency because of a > high buffer > size (unless a bug :) ). Thanks, exactly what I am try to tell :-) Bye, Axel.