Axel Dörfler wrote: > Adi Oanca <adioanca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>As I said, the buffer size has *nothing* to do with this anymore. >>>Have a look at LinkMsgSender::StartMessage() maybe you can believe >>>me >>>then :-) >> >> I had a look yesterday, that's why I did that test in the first >>place. The buffer always grows at a max of 64K, it never shrinks back >>to >>2K. >> Have another look, and this time maybe you should put you glasses. >>:-P >> >> I cannot believe you as I have my tests a a proof. ;-) > > > Just read what I wrote: the buffer size is completely independent from > this. There is no reason to decrease the buffer size anymore. I got that too late. :-D > I think > we should start with a bigger buffer, too, as there is only one link > per looper (I will change the BAppServerLink as well to not claim > memory anymore). > Ie. we should find out the largest value that will be send by a usual > application and have the initial buffer size cover that amount. I agree. Wanted to ask for a bigger value too, instead of increasing when needed. bye, Adi.