Adi Oanca <adioanca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > As I said, the buffer size has *nothing* to do with this anymore. > > Have a look at LinkMsgSender::StartMessage() maybe you can believe > > me > > then :-) > I had a look yesterday, that's why I did that test in the first > place. The buffer always grows at a max of 64K, it never shrinks back > to > 2K. > Have another look, and this time maybe you should put you glasses. > :-P > > I cannot believe you as I have my tests a a proof. ;-) Just read what I wrote: the buffer size is completely independent from this. There is no reason to decrease the buffer size anymore. I think we should start with a bigger buffer, too, as there is only one link per looper (I will change the BAppServerLink as well to not claim memory anymore). Ie. we should find out the largest value that will be send by a usual application and have the initial buffer size cover that amount. Bye, Axel.