[gmpi] Re: Parameters / controls / GMPI event system - refreshment
- From: thockin@xxxxxxxxxx
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 23:10:34 -0800
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 07:41:12PM -0500, Ron Kuper wrote:
> IMO the host should also set VID's (or whatever you name these "IDs") to
> match the composer's intent. synth will interpret based on the patch in
> use, and some hosts will be dumb and treat voices like channels. But the
> intent of VID's should be for hosts to specify polyphony, articulation and
> post-note-on changes.
I think that you and I are in agreement, then.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 6:06 PM
> Subject: [gmpi] Re: Parameters / controls / GMPI event system - refreshment
>
>
> >On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 08:46:58AM +1300, Jeff McClintock wrote:
> >>>>Isn't the easiest solution to re-use a VID?
> >>>>
> >>>>Note-On VID 0 G4
> >>>>Note-On VID 0 G4
> >>>>Note-On VID 0 G4
> >>>>Note-On VID 0 G4
> >>>
> >>> Again, this solves *this* problem but breaks the truly polyphonic mode
> >>> of
> >>> operation. How do you reconcile that?
> >>
> >>I'm saying the point of VID is that they give the *sender* the choice:
> >
> >And I think the sender owning the decision is wrong - it's dependant on
> >the patch. HOWEVER - you make an interesting use case here.
> >
> >>This score requires a solo trumpet...
> >>
> >>Note-on VID 0 G4
> >>...
> >>Note-on VID 0 G4
> >>...
> >>Note-on VID 0 A4
> >>
> >>This score requires a trumpet trio
> >>
> >>Note-on VID 0 G4
> >>...
> >>Note-on VID 1 G4
> >>...
> >>Note-on VID 2 A4
> >>
> >>Same patch, same notes, different *intention*.
> >
> >Right. But if the trumpet patch you use doesn't support polyphony
> >(because hey - it's a trumpet), then these two are the same, regardless of
> >your intentions.
> >
> >>Yes I agree, a piano patch, fed a non-challenging score could figure out
> >>which voices to allocate.
> >> A guitar however can't, each string supports an overlapping range of
> >>pitches, each string is independently bendable, power-chords
> >>deliberately use the same pitch on two strings.
> >>
> >>A guitar-synth needs explicit help allocating pitches to the correct
> >>string...
> >
> >We've already established that guitar synths are special, and a reasonable
> >answer is to do 1 string per channel.
> >
> >>The musician can switch-off keyboard-style VVID allocation.
> >>
> >>He should have a range of possible VVID assignments schemes including:
> >>-keyboards score mode
> >>-solo score
> >>-one-voice-per-note-in-the-score-mode
> >
> >OK. I think already said this, but this sounds fine to me. The host can
> >provide this explicit VPID re-use (as a feature). This isn't part of the
> >spec, I think, but a good thing to have worked out.
> >
> >Tell me if this sounds right, just as an example, sticking with the above
> >use case:
> >
> >This score requires a solo trumpet. The host sequences notes that are
> >explicitly tied together, somehow. The user explicitly connected the
> >notes.
> >
> >Note-on VPID(0) G4
> >Note-on VPID(0) G4
> >Note-on VPID(0) A4
> >
> >This score requires a trumpet trio. The host sequences individual notes.
> >
> >Note-on VPID(0) G4
> >Note-on VPID(1) G4
> >Note-on VPID(2) A4
> >
> >>ALL GMPI synths should respond the same simple way:
> >>-new VVID = assign new real-voice
> >>-re-used VVID = re-use real voice (internal voice limit allowing)
> >>
> >>That's my take anyway.
> >
> >This is the only thing I disagree with - re-using a VPID is a suggestion
> >to the plugin about the relationship between voices. The plugin can
> >choose to re-use the real voice or not, as it makes sense. The example
> >trumpet synth above would choose to re-use voices with re-used VPIDs.
> >
> >Does that taint your model too much?
> >
> >I'm still working on an animation.
> >
> >>thockin@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >>>On Sat, Dec 03, 2005 at 06:56:41PM +1300, Jeff McClintock wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>floorf(pitch) on the 2nd note to determinin which (real) voice to
> >>>>steal.
> >>>>
> >>>>What if I'm using a micro-tonal scale with say 24 pitches per octave (
> >>>>0.5 semitones per key).
> >>>>
> >>>>Won't your scheme steal the wrong voice?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>It might, but if you are using a microtonal scale you sould have to
> >>>substitute your own function for floorf() to round to the nearest pitch.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Isn't the easiest solution to re-use a VID?
> >>>>
> >>>>Note-On VID 0 G4
> >>>>Note-On VID 0 G4
> >>>>Note-On VID 0 G4
> >>>>Note-On VID 0 G4
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Again, this solves *this* problem but breaks the truly polyphonic mode
> >>>of
> >>>operation. How do you reconsile that?
> >>>
> >>>Tomorrow I'll get a better animation of what I mean, and I think you'll
> >>>all say "oh! that's what he meant."
> >>>
> >>>Tim
> >>>
> >>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
> >>>Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
> >>>following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your
> >>>own
> >>>words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
> >>>redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
> >>>
> >>>Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
> >>>Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
> >>Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
> >>following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
> >>words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
> >>redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
> >>
> >>Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
> >>Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
> >>
> >
> >--
> >Tim Hockin
> >thockin@xxxxxxxxxx
> >Soon anyone who's not on the World Wide Web will qualify for a government
> >subsidy for the home-pageless.
> >
> >----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
> >Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
> >following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
> >words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
> >redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
> >
> >Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
> >Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
> >
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
> Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
> following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
> words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
> redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
>
> Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
> Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
>
--
Tim Hockin
thockin@xxxxxxxxxx
Soon anyone who's not on the World Wide Web will qualify for a government
subsidy for the home-pageless.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
