On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 10:49:55 +0200, Frederic Vanmol wrote: > > seconded. its a major difficulty with supporting complex LADSPA > > plugins: generating a generic GUI is more or less impossible (steve's > > "hermes" plugin has more than 50 parameters IIRC ...) > > I don't really understand. Why do you need better generic interfaces for > plugins? If a plugin is complex, the author should provide an interface for > it, in my opinion. That was the point, I only wrote hermes to highlight the lack of standardised UI spec for LADSPA ;) An alternative to giveing each parameter a clump id would be to name them with paths, eg. "lfo_1/frequency", which allows parameters in different clumps to have the same name. But thats a much too low level discussion - sorry! - Steve ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe