[geocentrism] Re: plenum effects atmosphere?
- From: "Robert Bennett" <robert.bennett@xxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 00:07:23 -0500
Give me the e-mail address of Apollonius; I need to ask him about his model.
The plenum explains ALL the motions of bodies immersed in it, including
those which mod sci has classified as due to gravity , inertia, etc. Read
again my sentences below, which you quoted yourself.
I assume the WAF can also be the IAF, correct?
Pax Christi,
Robert
> -----Original Message-----
> From: geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Dr. Neville Jones
> Sent: Friday, February 25, 2005 7:20 PM
> To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [geocentrism] Re: plenum effects atmosphere?
>
>
> Robert,
>
> I ignored your question?
> A deplorable suggestion!
>
> I do not believe that planetary orbits are elliptical. Rather, I
> support the deferent and epicycle model of Apollonius of Perga.
> Planetary motion in this scenario is circular and at a uniform rate.
> You state that, "Another example would be the upward path of a
> projectile, which is always
> decelerating. The principal reason is gravity, which
> theogeocentrists (us) replace with the plenum."
>
> However, I would not attribute this resistance to any force of
> the plenum/firmament, but would attribute it in the conventional
> way to the World's gravitational attraction.
>
> In Christ,
>
> Neville.
>
>
> Robert Bennett <robert.bennett@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear Dr. Jones,
>
>
> I don't have the time
> to make everything rhyme...
>
> I would say re-adjust at the surface..... a flexible plenum.
>
> The reason for this inquiry line about plenum boundary is to
> establish where
> the properties of the plenum end.
> Once we know the plenum properties, we can test for differences across the
> boundary with experiments underwater (in a submarine?) - which we
> agree on -
> or underground - which is now undecided.
>
> You seem to use frictionless to mean 'undetectable'. Again a brief
> exposition would help.
>
> One example of slowing down would be planetary orbits (assuming
> you believe
> they are ellipses). In half the orbit the planet is slowing down.
> Along with
> Newton and Kepler I would not term this 'friction' when there is
> no visible
> contact with anything.
> Another example would be the upward path of a projectile, which is always
> decelerating. The principal reason is gravity, which theogeocentrists (us)
> replace with the plenum.
>
> The plenum channels I prefer to address when the proper
> foundation has been
> built.
>
> BTW: You didn't address all my Qs, mostly the ones I said were for later!
>
> Thanks for entertaining my thoughts.
>
>
> Pax Christi,
>
> Robert
> Send instant messages to your online friends
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Other related posts:
