[geocentrism] Re: Is geocentrism supported by facts?
- From: Paul Deema <paul_deema@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:57:38 +0000 (GMT)
Jack L
I don't think I'm wasting Regner's time -- if he chooses to, I'm quite sure he
is capable of ignoring what I say but I take the view that it doesn't hurt him
to know that he is not alone in the lion's den. (Not, I hasten to add, that I
have any illusion that he needs my help).
On the subject of wasting time, he asked for five firm affirmations of why your
position is correct and he specifically asked for short non detailed responses.
What we have seen so far, is long winded explanations of why Heliocentrism is
wrong -- neither affirmative nor concise. I don't think it is me who is wasting
time.
Paul D
----- Original Message ----
From: Jack Lewis <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, 18 October, 2007 6:24:05 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Is geocentrism supported by facts?
Dear Paul,
Considering the limited amount of time that Regner has said he is able to give
this forum, your e-mail isn't helpful since your are preaching to the
converted. I realise that the more heliocentrists that take part is more than
welcomed, but in this case your contribution is the complete opposite of what
he was asking. Had you not addressed it to him then I don't think it would have
mattered.
Regards
Jack
Sick of deleting your inbox? Yahoo!7 Mail has free unlimited storage.
http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/unlimitedstorage.html
Other related posts:
