[GeoStL] Re: Defend our freedom to share (or why SOPA is a bad idea)
- From: Michael Rogers <mrogers07@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:49:56 -0800 (PST)
Anyone who votes for this bill deserves to be run out of office or impeached.
By merely supporting this bill, Blunt and McCaskill have lost my vote.
-Michael
________________________________
From: Mike Griffin <brawnybear@xxxxxxxxx>
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 2:46 PM
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Defend our freedom to share (or why SOPA is a bad idea)
Welcome to the new POTUS forum!
Mike Griffin
Brawny Bear
St. Charles, MO
From:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:geocaching-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Tom Wolpert
Sent: January 19, 2012 2:16 PM
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Defend our freedom to share (or why SOPA is a bad
idea)
Interesting, since I got his reply yesterday morning --
beating his chest about being a co-sponsor and touting his staunch support.
Good to know he saw the handwriting on the wall. But now I think I
may puke. Here's his self-serving "it's all the Democrats' fault"
post on his Senate web site, announcing his flip-flop:
http://blunt.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/news?ID=12f286b9-83bb-41fc-b38b-bf9562fbb2ce
BTW, I'm an independent -- non-discriminatory in my dislike
of both parties. If I didn't have to live in this country, I'd think it
was all pretty hilarious :(
Tom
________________________________
From:Charles Leverett
<charlieleverett@xxxxxxxxx>
To: geocaching@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thu, January 19, 2012 1:59:14 PM
Subject: [GeoStL] Re: Defend our freedom to share (or why SOPA is a bad
idea)
After all the websites blacked out yesterday the Columbia Missourian reported
Blunt pulled his support of the bill. This doesn't suddenly make Blunt a good
person, but it does show how we effect the political process, even if it goes
against what Hollywood (or insert other powerful organization here) wants.
Other related posts:
