Reply to note from "Roger Beamon" <rbeamon1@xxxxxxx> Tue, 09 May 2006 15:28:11 -0700 > Speaking for myself, Eric, the fact that it is "bulletproof" is > a big advantage. > > I also like the color. To my eye, it is a fairly simple blue > without other hues such as green, turquoise and grey to take > away from it's blueness. Not the most saturated or the > flashiest blue, but good for the long haul. I second that on all counts, Rog. It's very similar to Gulf Stream Blue, which is "eternal" if not "bulletproof"; Gulf Stream may even be a tad bluer (and note well, Chuck W., it's less darned expensive!). Both have become "go to" inks for me. I use L.B. in my Pel M800 for signing letters and documents, and G.S. in my Aurora Optima for just about everything else. (Aquamarine is a close second. I cut it with Iraqi Indigo to tone down the greenish aspects.) I decided to revisit my bottle of Eel Blue, which I bought a year ago, and give it another try. It's a nice, mid-spectrum blue, in the same family as PR's Supershow and American blues. I'd put it aside because the drying time seemed too slow. Well, last night I loaded some into my Binderized Phileas stub, and wrote all day today with it (on cheap, recycled paper), and -- I was pleasantly surprised! It dried as fast as any other Noodler's ink; on this cheap paper, it was actually quick-drying. (I don't suppose Eel's lubricating properties dissipate with age...??) Can someone who has both Eel and regular Noodler's Blue confirm that the colors are one and the same? -- Viseguy viseguy@xxxxxxx ========================================================= To Unsubscribe: Send email to fptalk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe" in the Subject field. The email that you then receive MUST be replied to per instructions to complete the process.