Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- From: Corey R Clingo <corey.clingo@xxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 11:13:22 -0600
Right, but those are the device names. I'm talking about the bitmasks
that enable the devices as destinations.
And alas, it looks like our email has contracted the "=20" virus. We have
Notes, though, not Outlook.
Corey Clingo
BASF Corporation
"Johnson, Alex P \(IPS\)" <alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
01/02/2007 10:34 AM
Please respond to
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To
<foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary
reporter
Corey,
The GRxDVy parameters are strings. Strings are not connectable.
Regards,
=20
Alex Johnson
Invensys Systems, Inc.
10900 Equity Drive
Houston, TX 77041
713.329.8472 (voice)
713.329.1700 (fax)
713.329.1600 (switchboard)
alex.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Corey R Clingo
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 10:08 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process
summary reporter
Are the STATION.GR* parameters connectable? The documentation is mum
on=3D20
the topic. In fact, it only mentions these parameters once in
passing=3D20
when describing the configuration overlay.
I can use sequence to set the *GP parameters too, I imagine. They
are=3D20
settable, but not connectable (which also causes me problems with
access=3D20
control). What I want is to be able to lock them down with loopback=3D20
connections, or use CALC* blocks to drive them. I avoid sequence
where=3D20
possible, primarily because of the load it puts on the CP (at least in
the =3D
couple of sequence programs I have written).
Corey Clingo
BASF Corporation
Sascha Wildner <swildner@xxxxxxxxxx>=3D20
Sent by: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
01/02/2007 06:21 AM
Please respond to
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary=3D20
reporter
Corey R Clingo wrote:
> So let's take a poll: who would like to see connectable alarm=3D20
destination
> group (*GP) parameters?
If you use alarm groups 4-8 (configured in the station block) you can
set the masks with a sequence on the fly.
Not quite what you want but as Alex already pointed out...etc etc.
Regards,
--
Sascha Wildner
erpicon Software Development GmbH
Neusser Str. 724-726
50737 K=3DF6ln
Germany
Phone: +49 221 9746089
Fax: +49 221 9746099
eMail: swildner@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
