Are the STATION.GR* parameters connectable? The documentation is mum on=20 the topic. In fact, it only mentions these parameters once in passing=20 when describing the configuration overlay. I can use sequence to set the *GP parameters too, I imagine. They are=20 settable, but not connectable (which also causes me problems with access=20 control). What I want is to be able to lock them down with loopback=20 connections, or use CALC* blocks to drive them. I avoid sequence where=20 possible, primarily because of the load it puts on the CP (at least in the = couple of sequence programs I have written). Corey Clingo BASF Corporation Sascha Wildner <swildner@xxxxxxxxxx>=20 Sent by: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 01/02/2007 06:21 AM Please respond to foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx cc Subject Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary=20 reporter Corey R Clingo wrote: > So let's take a poll: who would like to see connectable alarm=20 destination > group (*GP) parameters? If you use alarm groups 4-8 (configured in the station block) you can set the masks with a sequence on the fly. Not quite what you want but as Alex already pointed out...etc etc. Regards, -- Sascha Wildner erpicon Software Development GmbH Neusser Str. 724-726 50737 K=F6ln Germany Phone: +49 221 9746089 Fax: +49 221 9746099 eMail: swildner@xxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave