Re: [foxboro] alarm inhibiting vs. alarm disabling - process summary reporter
- From: Sascha Wildner <swildner@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 13:21:14 +0100
Corey R Clingo wrote:
> So let's take a poll: who would like to see connectable alarm destination
> group (*GP) parameters?
If you use alarm groups 4-8 (configured in the station block) you can
set the masks with a sequence on the fly.
Not quite what you want but as Alex already pointed out...etc etc.
Regards,
--
Sascha Wildner
erpicon Software Development GmbH
Neusser Str. 724-726
50737 Köln
Germany
Phone: +49 221 9746089
Fax: +49 221 9746099
eMail: swildner@xxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
