formerly known as Arduino Eclipse Plugin :-D
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Roberto Lo Giacco <rlogiacco@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
+1 with me... you didn't like any of the many names I suggested :-(
(kidding) :-D
*S*oftware *L*ogic for *O*pen *E*lectronic *B*oards on *E*clipse *R*untime
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Jan Baeyens <jan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I may have missed something so....
Is there consensus on thee name Sloeber (Software Logic to program Open
Electronic Boards in an Eclipse Runtime)?
Best regards
Jantje
Op 20/05/2016 om 13:22 schreef Wim Jongman:
Software Logic to program Open Electronic Boards in an Eclipse Runtime
Specialized Logic to ..
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Jan Baeyens <jan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To replace the l I found following options
Logic
leader
Op 20/05/2016 om 1:19 schreef Roberto Lo Giacco:
Sorry, it was left in my drafts folder...
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:18 AM, Roberto Lo Giacco <
<rlogiacco@xxxxxxxxx>rlogiacco@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Jan Baeyens < <jan@xxxxxxxxxx>
jan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sloeber (Software Library to program Open Electronic Boards in anWe can bring something out to replace "library", but I do LOVE this!
Eclipse Runtime)
brilliant :-) but shouldn't it be SLOEBER as it is an abbreviation?Actually an acronym :-P
For me 2 for Sloeber (however it is written) and 1 for eclinoYou steal my suggestion? :-D
Well, you gave your votes on the first two suggestions... that' unfair
:-( :-P
(enough smilies?)
My names are:
- NEUTRINO
- MUGELLO
Op 19/05/2016 om 16:56 schreef Wim Jongman:
ROFL. But seriously, let's stop posting random words. Everyone can
post two names. Then we can vote for the names where everyone can give
three points. Either 1 point to three different names or more points to a
specific name.
I propose (until someone reclaims it):
Sloeber (Software Library to program Open Electronic Boards in an
Eclipse Runtime)
Eclino (Eclipse Arduino, Thanks Roberto ;)
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Roberto Lo Giacco <
<rlogiacco@xxxxxxxxx>rlogiacco@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I do like Sloeber...... sounds *unique*... I don't know what it
means, but I like the way it sounds... at least the way I pronounce it,
which is practically muting out the *e* in the *oe* part.
Also, what about completely different names:
* Lettuce (it's fresh!)
* Seven (my favorite number)
* Neutrino (you know....)
* Gluon (it's cool, it's gluish)
* Charge (yeah, give me some!)
* BitCharge (that's even more soft-ware)
* NRG (pronounced as energy.... *let's power up the firmware the
development* as motto)
* Mugello (motorbike famous circuit, just because I like
motorbikes....)
I'm not personally excited by eclino, consider my vote as a 0 (not a
+1, not a -1) :-D
Roberto
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Jan Baeyens < <jan@xxxxxxxxxx>
jan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I don't think calling the software EvilCreature or EC or Sloeber is
a good idea.
For me we are still at eclino
Op 19/05/2016 om 13:45 schreef Roberto Lo Giacco:
I'm one of those who get really attached to animals... I feel sorry
for your loss...
I agree about naming the software after your evil creature... If
it's one of those unpronounceable Nordic names, EC or EvilCreature is
fine
with me!
Il giovedì 19 maggio 2016, Jan Baeyens < <jan@xxxxxxxxxx>
jan@xxxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:
That is 3 votes for eclino
Marcelo, do you like eclino? (don't feel pressured to say yes.) ;-)
Evil creature has been going to the doctor last month every week
for antibiotics. Then all was ok and then back to skinny cat. So I put
her
at the doctor for observation and anti biotic. The doctor called this
morning to tell me evil creature has "cat aids".
After internal discussion we decided to end the pain of "evil
creature"
Op 19/05/2016 om 13:19 schreef Wim Jongman:
Dah, you stabbed her once to many did you?
I like *Eclino*
Everything with yam is yaml alike
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Jan Baeyens < <jan@xxxxxxxxxx>
jan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
yamIDE (yet another mcu IDE)
For those interested. With pain in the hart, "Evil creature" is no
longer.
Op 18/05/2016 om 23:36 schreef Wim Jongman:
Totally different industry, should not be a problem.
Cheers,
Wim
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Jan Baeyens < <jan@xxxxxxxxxx>
jan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I like Eclino as well.
unfortunately google does return quite some hits on it.
Op 18/05/2016 om 20:44 schreef Roberto Lo Giacco:
:-) No
Arduclipse OR Eclino
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 8:43 PM, Wim Jongman <
<wim.jongman@xxxxxxxxx>wim.jongman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
*ArduinoEclipse*
*EclipseArduino *
Arduclipseclino?
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Roberto Lo Giacco <
<rlogiacco@xxxxxxxxx>rlogiacco@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
*ArduinoEclipse*
*EclipseArduino *
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Marcelo Limori <
<x4j7h32m@xxxxxxxxx>x4j7h32m@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And you didn't see the list I came up with. :D
2016-05-18 14:38 GMT-03:00 Jan Baeyens < <jan@xxxxxxxxxx>
jan@xxxxxxxxxx>:
rofl
Sounds like most names I read are crap ;-)
Op 18/05/2016 om 19:11 schreef Marcelo Limori:
Maybe you could ask on the Arduino forums. Or throw a small
contest perhaps. That way you get ideas and promote the thing at
the same
time.
2016-05-18 12:21 GMT-03:00 Jan Baeyens < <jan@xxxxxxxxxx>
jan@xxxxxxxxxx>:
brilIDE (briljant ide)
Op 18/05/2016 om 13:15 schreef Wim Jongman:
Solide - Soldering, IDE and quality
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Roberto Lo Giacco <
<rlogiacco@xxxxxxxxx>rlogiacco@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Keep throwing names lads, something will come...
- Euclide (*E*clipse for *M*icro *C*ontro*L*ler *IDE*,
famous greek mathematician)
- NitrIDE (Nitro seemed a cool name, banging....)
- EpoxIDE (also epoxy glue has somewhat to do with
makers movement.... let's say we glue together micro
controllers
developement?)
- Identiality (the IDE for people??? Don't know, seemed
cool when it came to my mind)
- SilicIDE (silicon devices IDE?)
- BlueIDE (blue is the common colour between eclipse
and arduino palettes.....?!? I know, it's getting tough
even to explain....)
- Idetached (..........!?!.............. don't know)
- Idexterity (even sillier... I know, I know)
Keep them flowing....
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:58 PM, Jan Baeyens <
<jan@xxxxxxxxxx>jan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I really do not know what to go for as a name.
it is one of these (not so rare) things I'm not good at.
I'd really would like a disicion as 7 juli is comming closer
and closer.
But I don't know.
What I think: It is a good idea to drop the name Arduino
(think about Arduino and Genuino)
A proper name (not a descriptive text) is the way to go.
My brainstorm gets to
futide (resistance is futile and then ide)
wromjai (mix of ja wi ro ma )
SeePeePeeMCUIDE (cpp mcu ide)
trueWholeIDE (from through hole ide)
CUICIDE (in use :-( )
picolide (seem to be some chemical)
picoide (pico seems to be a programming language so
picoide exists)
jawiro (jan wim roberto :-( already in use)
Op 15/05/2016 om 17:27 schreef Roberto Lo Giacco:
Little reminder about Eclipse name usage rules
<https://eclipse.org/legal/logo_guidelines.php#ProperEclipse>
https://eclipse.org/legal/logo_guidelines.php#ProperEclipse
Actually I believe the correct naming, if we wish to go
for the *edition* thing would be Arduino IDE, Eclipse
Edition (note the comma) which makes us infringe/collide with
the Arduino
IDE...
Let's brainstorm this, shall we?
We are here talking about a microcontroller development
environment, based on eclipse which includes parts of the
Arduino software
platform, but goes further than just Arduino micros.
- µIDE (with µ being the greek letter for micro...
hard to represent in non UTF8 contexts, it would become
uIDE)
- microDEV (is this somewhat pretentious?)
- AISA (Ambiente Integrato di Sviluppo per Arduino,
italian for Arduino IDE)
- Beyond IDE (meaning beyond Arduino and Eclipse)
- Avatar (I actually don't know why)
- Pathfinder (well, they use Mars, this was the name
of the most known probe landing on mars.... probably
better used as
codename for one of our releases)
- Aride (ARduino IDE, in Italian it means *arid*,
plural and feminine)
I know, many of the above are pretty shit, but if we go
for brainstorming we should not be ashamed of the shittiest
ideas ever,
right? :-)
Roberto
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Jan Baeyens <
<jan@xxxxxxxxxx>jan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Marcelo
Please don't pardon :-)
There has been quite some discussion about the name yet.
Here is some history for you.
Historically it has been named "Arduino Eclipse Plugin"
as it used to be only a plugin and because nobody bothered
as we never
realized it would ever be as big as it is today.
Then Wim added the product. Which makes the name "Arduino
Eclipse Plugin" "no longer to covers the cargo" (sorry don't
know the
Englsh expression)
Then there is the casing (which -at simple request of Wim
;-) - I will not cover)
During the discussion with Eclipse legal it was mentioned
that the name might not be confirm trademark ruling.
Basically legal
advises to make our own name product name.
Legally Eclipse allows "eclipse edition" and Arduino does
not really specify what is allowed for software. But for
boards "for
Arduino" is allowed but "XXX Arduino" is not.
IMHO "Eclipse for C++" is actually CDT which stands for
"C++ development tools" like JDT stands for "Java
development tools". In
that trend we could call it ADT "Arduino Development tools"
or MDT (MCU) or
IDT (iot).
Personally I do not really like this 3 letter
abbreviation words. But I'm democratic guy ....
One of the reasons I like "Arduino IDE eclipse edition"
(but I am not crazy about it) is that we could make "IDE"
and "edition"
really small (far smaller that you have made them on the
splash) so it
still looks like "Arduino eclipse" as on the current splash.
So that would
make the official name "Arduino IDE eclipse edition",
"Arduino Eclipse" in
short.
I think these are the headline of the current name
discussion
Best regards
Jantje
On 14-05-16 19:22, Marcelo Limori wrote:
Pardon the interruption, but wouldn't be more logical
Eclipse Arduino Edition? You don't have C++ Eclipse Edition,
you have
Eclipse for C++.
2016-05-14 6:08 GMT-03:00 Wim Jongman <
<wim.jongman@xxxxxxxxx>wim.jongman@xxxxxxxxx>:
LMAO(BW)
On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Jan Baeyens <
<jan@xxxxxxxxxx>jan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
ROFL
Yes sir
