I don't think there's a class who has infinite resource anymore (without proper gear). Closest 2 is probably DH and WD (WD Essence Rush passive is OP). Yeah Barb got nerfed bad (compare to pre-2.0.1) On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:22 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > Sap is playing wizard. I had to resort to using follower coz i kept dying > > ------------------------------ > From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx > > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: hi > Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:20:09 +0000 > > > Wizard! > > > Frozen orb is boss > > ------------------------------ > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: hi > Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:14:37 +0000 > > Don't worry too much about them because you can always reset them. > > > > Go with res-all before +% life. > > Your movement speed (total, including equip) should be +25%. I get 12% > from Inna Pants, 12% from Lacuni and 1% from paragon levels. > > Go with attack speed. > > > > Depending on your build, some other things change - like whether you want > splash damage. > > > > The Barb has been nerfed massively, especially in comparison to the Monk. > Don't expect your Barb to be unkillable anymore. Also don't expect any > perma-builds. > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets > *Sent:* 04 March 2014 2:06 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* RE: hi > > > > Aah okay i see thanks. I duno where to put my paragon levels, everythng > luks gud. > ------------------------------ > > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: hi > Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:00:29 +0000 > > Oh wait, are you talking about a WW Barb? I thought you meant the twirly > Monk thing. > > > > Viable WW builds now? Uh, not really there. Well, you can get them, but > you need to be properly equipped. > > > > Previously you used Battle Rage > Into the Fray so that crit hits > generated fury. Then WoTB > Thrive on Chaos allowed you to add time to WoTB > for fury generated. > > As long as you had crit chance of around 40% unbuffed, your passives and > skills could push this past 80%. That meant you'd never run out of fury as > long as you hit enough people fast enough. > > > > HoTA - crit chance higher if you've got full fury - meant that my crit > chance was around 95% for HoTA. > > > > For WW barb, you added the WW rune that lets you attack at your movement > speed. Then you add Sprint with the Tornados. They proc'd enough to > generate your non-stop fury. WW dealt the damage to kill. Throw in Rend to > make you Immortal and you're good to go. > > > > A proper working WW barb would set you back only around 50m. > > > > > > TL:DR - these builds no longer work - you can't generate fury from crit > hits. L2P > > > > Superstition is a great passive now for fury generation. Against elemental > elites, you will never run out of fury. You can perma-HoTA them. As long as > your fury spent to life is high enough, you can live doing this. > > > > http://us.battle.net/d3/en/calculator/barbarian#ahdRSk!hYe!ZcYcZb > > > > That's the sort of thing you should go for if you want a WW build these > days. > > > > Also, the Barbarian is not a ballerina. Stop using WW. > > > > Also, your BB is level 26 or some crap. Come back when you're max level > and we'll talk again. There are no builds for low level Barbs. Get level > reduced gear and shove gems in there. > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] > *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets > *Sent:* 04 March 2014 1:44 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* RE: hi > > > > Ya fkn paye registration. U need to give me info on keeping up that spin > dammit. > ------------------------------ > > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: hi > Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 11:40:07 +0000 > > You physically go to SARS? You do know that you can do your tax online, > right? Also your company should send the IRP5s straight to SARS to > pre-populate the tax fields. Takes me about 5 minutes to do my tax every > year. > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] > *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets > *Sent:* 04 March 2014 1:38 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* RE: hi > > > > Why is sars so kuk full wtf? Im running outa mana quick when i spin. How > did ppl keep up the spin for so long in vanilla d3? > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 12:12:59 +0200 > Subject: Re: hi > From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > What would you say if Infiltration didn't change his tactic? That he is > just stupid? Or what if Sanford had changed his tactic and Infiltration > didn't? > > You're overcomplicating it and looking at it in the wrong way. Remember, > Infiltration was just reacting to Sanford Kelly. He was just remembered > the situation from before and progressively punished harder after getting > hit by it once. There wasn't a big tactical aspect behind it. He just > adapted to what Sanford was doing. There's no luck involved either. Given > the number of options players have at that range, it's extremely hard to > perform a counter on reaction. You have to place that counter higher in > your memory bank. Remember how we played once and you hit me with a focus > attack, and then afterwards I kept punishing it with an Ultra? Same > thing. The difference is that the way Infiltration handled it there was no > easy way for him to get baited into punishing incorrectly. cr.mk xx > tatsu would work even if Sanford Kelly backdashed, so would cr.hk xx > demon. > > > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Grei Botes <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I suppose "I don't know". > > Pah, I know it sounds silly but if I changed what I did every time I got > hit by something, I'm not respecting the fact the guy probably has > something else up his sleeve to "counter my counter". > > I just use a "penalty shootout" mentality to deal with mixups. If I always > go left as goalie, whether you know it or not, eventually you will shoot > left, at least once, even if you KNOW shooting right seems to be the best > option. Its called probability matching, and its generally inherent in any > living organism. > > Anyway, after the blocked shot, the general option by the shooter will be > to switch back to the winning option... but that is when the goalie changes > too! This usually shatters the morale of the shooter... or at least gives > me a nice comfortable spot "inside his head", although I didn't do a single > thing. > > Its the same reason that I prefer to "air to air" a guy then use an > anti-air, because that means I 'knew' you were going to jump and that is > scary. DP could just be from reaction. > > > TL:DR, I try and get you used to be me being silly and then turn smart. It > catches you unawares and you lose the match :-) > > Doesn't work on guys who stick to their guns though. > > So totally is luck, rather than adaption. What would you say if > Infiltration didn't change his tactic? That he is just stupid? Or what if > Sanford had changed his tactic and Infiltration didn't? > > Anyway, there are probably arguments for and against what I'm saying, > doesn't really matter. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. >