Officials? Aren’t they going to be on commentary?
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On ;
Behalf Of Nicholas Robertson-Muir
Sent: 10 February 2016 04:00 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
In real terms then.
We dominate our own tournaments.
The focus should be on new blood.
GB and LB are OP and want to take a back seat so that said new blood can play.
It is going to be hard to get new blood.
I understand.
Well then:
@LB+GB
Would you guys be interested in helping with the organization of the tournament
as officials?
Do you have any ideas to bring in numbers?
On 10 Feb 2016 14:21, "lindsey kiviets"
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I completely disagree with his view/opinion.
We have limited opportunities participating in sponsored tournaments as the CPT
fgc.
It would be a shame and disrespectful to Mweb to keep away from this tournament
since they want:
1. A tournament with big numbers.
2. Diverse player skill level and a true reflection of player's
cultures/backgrounds of Cape Town.
3. Entertaining tournament for everyone (not just noobs).
To round of my point, it's sad that the small fgc has to walk on egg shells and
with no freedom or in this case omit from having a great time of playing games
we love while other genres like the fps are free to be picky elitists with
their games and continue getting the support amd sponsored events.
**********************************************************************
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
