Yes. Many times. Did my ps3 paste over because they use shit stuff and too little sometimes. On Thursday, February 19, 2015, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > LOL @ salie > > I bought thermal paste and im ready to apply that sheet. > > have any of you guys applied that before? > > ------------------------------ > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx');> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx');> > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 12:01:28 +0000 > > It’s also not just a question of actual trackers. > > King’s got nice homing moves – the rolling sabot thing – f+3. It’s mid, > safe, fast and homing. Ub+1 is the other one – you ss and get a high homing > move. Works especially nicely after a ss – you can almost go around the > opponent while doing a homing move. > > Anyways, those aside, the moves that you spam with King – df+1,2 or df+2,1 > or df+4 or 2,1 – all of them seem to just track a bit. Now I get that some > moves track a bit to certain sides, but Kings moves just seem to follow the > opponent better than the stuff Paul does. On Paul’s side, d+1, db+4 (and > ws+4 actually) seem to do an okay job at close range for stopping the > opponent. Of those three moves, only one of them is for throwing out while > standing around – d+1. It’s not the fastest move out there though (well at > least faster in TTT2 than BR though). > > > > *From:* Donaldson, Alasdair > *Sent:* 19 February 2015 1:54 PM > *To:* 'cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx');>' > *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail > > > > Paul’s df+1 isn’t the best for tracking. D+1 will do a better job. > > Yeah, the df+2. In theory it doesn’t do anything special. In reality… > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx');> [ > mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx');>] *On > Behalf Of *Di Lhong > *Sent:* 19 February 2015 1:50 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx');> > *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail > > > > Yeah, the notation is a bit awkward. Stick to d+1 db+4 and df1 (not sure > how well does df1 track)...Also df2 tracks a little i think. > > In general, quick lows usually track. Unless it has special property or > something (eg. hits ground or something like that). > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx');>> wrote: > > Paul’s is 28f. > > On normal hit, I get a knd, but it also hits the guy strangely, so not > nice oki. On CH I get full combo as in after it, I go for qcf+1 elbow > launch. > > > > @Di – no idea how fast his qcb+4 is. The major problem with that is that > it’s not something that I can do in retaliation to seeing movement. It’s an > amazing move in general and sweet on CH, but the fact that it comes out of > a swy means that it loses the homing usefulness. > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx');> [mailto: > cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx');>] *On > Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben > *Sent:* 19 February 2015 1:41 PM > > > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx');> > *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail > > > > what does paul get off his Tracker on hit/CH? > > I think Lei's is 1f slower(24f) with absolutely zero reward because he is > forced to taunt. > ------------------------------ > > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx');> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx');> > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:35:24 +0000 > > Sure, while you’re at it, why not give Paul a tracker that’s under 25f as > well. > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx');> [ > mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx');>] *On > Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben > *Sent:* 19 February 2015 1:33 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx');> > *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail > > > > Or make 1+2 track. > > Its high so can be ducked and stuff > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:27:31 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx');> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx');> > > Without ff+3...Lei has df+3 which is bad...especially on hit XD > > If they just make ff+3 a homing move, i wouldn't mind that. It's the fact > it's not and we keep thinking we can step it... > > If they make Lei like Brad Wong. I'm quitting. That drunken BS is too > fluid with no space for interruption between stance transition. > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx');>> wrote: > > Dude ff+3 has stupid tracking. > > Lei will track fine without it doing both sides track. > > > > > > On 19 February 2015 at 13:21, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx');>> wrote: > > Lei's options getting stepped is already his a major weakness he has. > > He cant punish stepping properly and his trackers are ass. > > Its not even like ff+3 tracks properly either(And im fairly sure its only > to one side). Cant decide to ff+3 because I think the opponent is going to > step. > > Lei is no better gameplay wise than he was in T6. His damage boost is the > only reason hes considered High in TTT2. > > Nerfing his tracking is the very last thing Lei needs. > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 13:14:29 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx');> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx');> > > > > I would just make ff+3 a bit more linear ~ able to walk it to one side or > something. > > Most of the tier list I've seen for TTT2 put him quite high. > > > > ...............There is nothing new we could discuss about Lei, we always > bitch about him. > > > > On 19 February 2015 at 11:45, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx');>> wrote: > > Spam raisin rush. You don’t need anything else. > > I wonder what they’ve done about Lei’s combo damage. Just that isn’t > enough to help a character. Hwo always has high combo damage, but lacks the > other tools to make him top tier. Lei, however, also has good punishment > and average pokes. > > Got to say that I don’t think Lei is a particularly low character. I’d put > him happily mid – probably below Paul though. > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx');> [mailto: > cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx');>] *On > Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben > *Sent:* 19 February 2015 11:38 AM > > > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx');> > *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail > > > > > > lol > > They could... but then hes going to need major buffs in order to compete. > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:34:12 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx');> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx');> > > Remove ff+3. > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx');>> wrote: > > His "poking" and non gimmicky stance game is not great. If you remove > the shenanigans hes a below average character. > > So if they remove half his moves. Ie less gimmicks he needs stronger > tools to play a more normal game. > > > He got a big damage buff in TTT2 but they didnt fix any of the core > problems with his moves sadly. > ------------------------------ > > From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx');> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx');> > Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:25:30 +0000 > > > > Lei needs buffs? LOL! > Good one Paas. I need that. > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx');> [mailto: > cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx');>] *On > Behalf Of *Wynand-Ben > *Sent:* 19 February 2015 11:12 AM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx');> > *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail > > > > They could pretty much dump half of Lei's movelist but then they would > have to buff the rest of his stuff. > > Currently he has boatload of very situational moves combined with some > that are just straight up bad. > ------------------------------ > > Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 11:02:06 +0200 > Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail > From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx');> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx');> > > Lei and Capo lolz They need to remove some of their stuff and update them > properly. > > Zafina might have a large move list. But all her moves are decent and > useful. > > I wouldn't mind if they do a total revamp like they did for SC5. Maybe the > series needs it. But keep some of the original cast and strong point of > Tekken. > > Lucky Chloe moves are basically Capo Light. The same but doesn't knockdown > lolz. She have a slippery kick that doesn't knock down and looks punishable > as hell. On hit doesn't stagger or give much frames either T_T > > > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. >