Re: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:58:13 +0200

Is Tarkovksy the guy who makes the rapey horrible movies?
That shit sucks.

On 11 February 2015 at 11:46, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Enter the Void is meh...  Could have been a 100 times better if they
> didn't spend ages trying to get the viewer to understand the themes.  Good
> if you're on LSD I guess.
>
> Tarkovksy's movies are challenging, mostly because they are in Russian,
> are often very surreal, and deal with difficult themes.  Not easy viewing.
>
> The Massive Attack video is Unfinished Sympathy.  The one where they
> follow the singer (Shara Nelson) around the city.  They used to play that
> and Safe From Harm on Zero Hour Zone on TV4 (who remembers that?).  I
> thought you were talking about a movie called Massive Attack hehe.
>
> I liked Gravity.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>  I’ve got Enter the Void lying around, but haven’t got around to
>> watching it. Same with Under the Skin. No idea who Tarkovksy is. Just
>> checked IMDB. Nope. Are his films worth watching? I mean from a
>> non-technical perspective.
>>
>>
>>
>> First time I saw the Massive Attack video, I didn’t realise that it was
>> all one shot. I just assumed they’d cut it. I forget what the song was
>> called, but it was more than 5min long.
>>
>> Snake Eyes was an okay film. It wasn’t bad or good… actually can’t
>> remember much about the film.
>>
>>
>>
>> I don’t know if I can be arsed to watch Gravity. Maybe I’ll put it on
>> sometime while I’m reading. The only thing that I’ve heard about Gravity is
>> that it is a very pretty film. No one seems to care about the story or
>> script. That seems like a bit of a fail to me.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama
>> *Sent:* 11 February 2015 11:15 AM
>>
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>
>>
>>
>> I haven't seen either, but last year there was Gravity which had a 17
>> minute opening shot.  Under the Skin had shots the seem to be influenced by
>> filmmakers like Tarkovksy.  The Protector has a 4 minute long shot (the
>> stair case fight scene).  Enter the Void is composed of long shots (about 1
>> to 2 minutes in length), joined together by psychedelic visuals.
>>
>> In The Sacrifice, Tarkovsky's crew built a special house meant to be
>> burned down in a 6 minute long shot.  Toward the end of the shot the camera
>> jammed and the film was ruined.  It took them two weeks to refilm it.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mr5cYiRPf3E
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  It opened at Cinema Nouveau up here.
>>
>> Long scenes are cool. Barring Massive Attack, nothing comes to mind
>> though. Oh, wasn’t the first 10min of Snake Eyes a single shot?
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama
>> *Sent:* 11 February 2015 10:46 AM
>>
>>
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>
>>
>>
>> Low budget?  Yes.  And it only opened in 4 cinemas, raking in less than
>> $500k.  But it's probably best considered Arthouse, not B movie.
>>
>> You can't not notice the camera work in Birdman.  The entire movie,
>> barring 1 or 2 scenes in the beginning is shot in one long continuous
>> sequence.  It's obviously an illusion but it's still great to watch.  There
>> are scenes where they film in front of a mirror and you can't see the
>> camera.  There's a seen where the camera follows Michael Keaton through a
>> busy square in NYC.  And a great scene where the camera glides from the
>> theatre rafters to the stage below.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 7:32 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  for best gimmick in a film
>>
>> soim guessing if birdman was shot in 30 days , that would make it a low
>> budget B movie?
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 05:29:06 +0000
>>
>>
>>
>> Then I suppose they’d be guaranteed the Oscar.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>> *Sent:* 11 February 2015 7:24 AM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>
>>
>>
>> boyhood - what if the kid died during that 12 years?
>>
>> "rock is overpowered, paper is fine" - scissors
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 05:09:25 +0000
>>
>> I tend to figure that the camera work is only something you notice if
>> it’s done badly. I can’t recall when last I noticed good camera work in a
>> film.
>>
>> Same with most of the things, I guess. It’s only when the music is
>> jarring and detracts from the scene that I actually notice it.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama
>> *Sent:* 11 February 2015 12:50 AM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>
>>
>>
>> Sheesh... apparently the movie was shot in only 30 days.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Birdman's camera work is amazing.  I haven't been that technically
>> impressed by a movie in a long itme.  All the while I kept thinking "I
>> can't imagine how hard it must have been to film this".  Fantastic
>> cinematography.
>>
>>
>>   ------------------------------
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>   ------------------------------
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>>
>>     ------------------------------
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>
>

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. cpt-fgc
  3. Archive
  4. 02-2015