Re: DRE: CTS community mail

  • From: Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 12:47:46 +0200

> they feel threaten that the poor will steal their tech and invade their
colony

Better than invading their colons, I guess.

On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> They're trying to portray the whole segregate between the rich and poor.
> Living WITH the poor wasn't an option, they feel threaten that the poor
> will steal their tech and invade their colony...so they went to space...
>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:34 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> Elysium wasn't cool.
>>
>> why fly up everyone to space when they can just easily bring that tech
>> down to earth?
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 12:27:07 +0200
>> Subject: Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>> From: geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>> Elysium was ok. Nothing too mind blowing.
>>
>> District 9 sequel needs to happen too. But after Alien sequel lolz
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> @Di
>> Neill is godlike and I loved District 9, maybe a sequel?
>> How did you find Elyisium?
>> I was a little disappointed by it.
>> On 11 Feb 2015 12:01, "Di Lhong" <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Neill Blomkamp may direct Alien sequal with Ripley? Yes please! this
>> needs to happen.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Di Lhong <geosaurus8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Yeah. I tend to go to movies without reading reviews or pay too much on
>> trailers nowadays. That way i go in with 0 expectation and i can fully
>> review it without being sceptic by rottentomatoes or other reviews.
>>
>> Like Cabin in the Woods. I had no idea what that movie was suppose to be.
>> Thought it was another slasher flick. Was happy it was a whole new level of
>> movie.
>>
>> But movies that push A LOT of CGI and trailers makes me doubt
>> sometimes...cough cough* Hobbit...
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Never buy into the "hype" that surrounds blockbuster movies.
>>
>> It only leads to disappointment
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:41:12 +0200
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>> I was expecting better and was sorely dissapointed.
>> On 11 Feb 2015 11:38, "Wynand-Ben" <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Gravity is pretty indeed.  Thing looks great.
>>
>> The plot and stuff is decent but wont blow anybody away.  Was expecting
>> worse and liked it in the end.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:34:18 +0000
>>
>>  I’ve got Enter the Void lying around, but haven’t got around to
>> watching it. Same with Under the Skin. No idea who Tarkovksy is. Just
>> checked IMDB. Nope. Are his films worth watching? I mean from a
>> non-technical perspective.
>>
>> First time I saw the Massive Attack video, I didn’t realise that it was
>> all one shot. I just assumed they’d cut it. I forget what the song was
>> called, but it was more than 5min long.
>> Snake Eyes was an okay film. It wasn’t bad or good… actually can’t
>> remember much about the film.
>>
>> I don’t know if I can be arsed to watch Gravity. Maybe I’ll put it on
>> sometime while I’m reading. The only thing that I’ve heard about Gravity is
>> that it is a very pretty film. No one seems to care about the story or
>> script. That seems like a bit of a fail to me.
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama
>> *Sent:* 11 February 2015 11:15 AM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>
>>  I haven't seen either, but last year there was Gravity which had a 17
>> minute opening shot.  Under the Skin had shots the seem to be influenced by
>> filmmakers like Tarkovksy.  The Protector has a 4 minute long shot (the
>> stair case fight scene).  Enter the Void is composed of long shots (about 1
>> to 2 minutes in length), joined together by psychedelic visuals.
>>  In The Sacrifice, Tarkovsky's crew built a special house meant to be
>> burned down in a 6 minute long shot.  Toward the end of the shot the camera
>> jammed and the film was ruined.  It took them two weeks to refilm it.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mr5cYiRPf3E
>>
>>  On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>  It opened at Cinema Nouveau up here.
>> Long scenes are cool. Barring Massive Attack, nothing comes to mind
>> though. Oh, wasn’t the first 10min of Snake Eyes a single shot?
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> *On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama
>> *Sent:* 11 February 2015 10:46 AM
>>
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>
>>  Low budget?  Yes.  And it only opened in 4 cinemas, raking in less than
>> $500k.  But it's probably best considered Arthouse, not B movie.
>>  You can't not notice the camera work in Birdman.  The entire movie,
>> barring 1 or 2 scenes in the beginning is shot in one long continuous
>> sequence.  It's obviously an illusion but it's still great to watch.  There
>> are scenes where they film in front of a mirror and you can't see the
>> camera.  There's a seen where the camera follows Michael Keaton through a
>> busy square in NYC.  And a great scene where the camera glides from the
>> theatre rafters to the stage below.
>>
>>  On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 7:32 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  for best gimmick in a film
>>
>> soim guessing if birdman was shot in 30 days , that would make it a low
>> budget B movie?
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 05:29:06 +0000
>>
>>  Then I suppose they’d be guaranteed the Oscar.
>>
>>  *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>> *Sent:* 11 February 2015 7:24 AM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>>
>>  boyhood - what if the kid died during that 12 years?
>>
>> "rock is overpowered, paper is fine" - scissors
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>  From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: DRE: CTS community mail
>> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 05:09:25 +0000
>>  I tend to figure that the camera work is only something you notice if
>> it’s done badly. I can’t recall when last I noticed good camera work in a
>> film.
>> Same with most of the things, I guess. It’s only when the music is
>> jarring and detracts from the scene that I actually notice it.
>>
>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Ilitirit Sama
>> *Sent:* 11 February 2015 12:50 AM
>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> *Subject:* Re: DRE: CTS community mail
>>
>>  Sheesh... apparently the movie was shot in only 30 days.
>>
>>  On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Birdman's camera work is amazing.  I haven't been that technically
>> impressed by a movie in a long itme.  All the while I kept thinking "I
>> can't imagine how hard it must have been to film this".  Fantastic
>> cinematography.
>>
>>
>>   ------------------------------
>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>   ------------------------------
>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>>
>>     ------------------------------
>>  The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. cpt-fgc
  3. Archive
  4. 02-2015