Re: CTS community mail
- From: Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:48:12 +0200
Nic's already enquired about it. We're just waiting for feedback.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Can Jeeva can provide us with a timetable of when he’ll be having the
> training courses so that we can make sure it’s a Kami day?
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
> *Sent:* 19 November 2014 12:26 PM
> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> *Subject:* Re: CTS community mail
>
>
>
> Thank you all, for your comments and suggestions. Much appreciated. (Tsek
> LB)
>
>
>
> After careful consideration - having taken all feedback into account and
> having discussed the matter further with Nic - I am of the opinion that we
> should alternate between the GamerNET house and Kamimodo. We can have two
> sessions at each respective venue per month, so two at GamerNET house, two
> at Kamimodo, etc. You guys can decide how we should do it; either two
> consecutive sessions at each venue, or one Sat at GamerNET, then the next
> at Kamimodo, you get the idea.
>
>
>
> Provided everyone is in favour of the aforementioned proposal, I will
> discuss the details with Zaid and see what we can work out.
>
>
>
> Naturally, if anyone isn't happy with the proposal, please feel free to
> post up so that we can ensure that everyone is in agreement before we
> proceed.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Ashraf Barendse <
> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Lolz
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omyAD-SRXaI
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 8:11 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRDWsUudRrE
>
> dh;s got it the worst
> ------------------------------
>
> From: ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 18:07:57 +0200
>
>
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Here's a cool site where you can view all the SF4 hitboxes in slow mo.
>
> http://decapre.com/watch?v=e562yD76O84
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Hackcellent !!
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, November 18, 2014, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Ordered my PSTV yesterday.
> I should get it by the 8th next month.
>
> I'm going to hack together PS4 remote play on my Samsung Galaxy tab
> tonight.
> Should be fun.
>
> On 18 Nov 2014 09:59, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Vagina slap.
>
> Ham wallet cheek check.
>
> Minge smack.
>
> On Tuesday, November 18, 2014, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>
> " if u donts fckn leave I wills pk u"
>
> LMAO
>
> what does pk mean in english
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 22:45:52 +0200
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Kim Kaphwan vs Juri
>
> One Minute Melee - Kim vs Juri (King of Fighters vs Street Fighter)
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTZ8xtVxhCM>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> I won a R100 MM in pool last night.
>
> I am the Prince.
>
>
> On Monday, November 17, 2014, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Age of Wushu: Royal Guard vs Tangmen
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30MSGoNuXuc>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 21:29:32 +0200
> Subject: RE: CTS community mail
> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Now I think... yeah. I'm prertty sure I don't want to ask you anything
> again.
> Ever.
>
> On 17 Nov 2014 20:25, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> what do I know about poontang??????????
>
> ask me again
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 19:47:18 +0200
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> From: theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> LB agrees with anything said -_-
>
> On 17 Nov 2014 19:04, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> mmm...
>
> Right now we pay R120 a month for under 30 hours.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Ashraf Barendse <
> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The regular prices that Kamimodo have advertised are:
>
> 25 an hour per person.
>
> membership R300 pm
>
> for groups, it's R250 pm per person.
>
> This includes
> up to 30 hours per month
>
> free entry to gaming leagues
>
> free entry to events
>
> Internet usage
>
> 10% off food at the cafeteria
>
> 2 Lan parties
>
> So if we provide our own consoles/screens and only come on saturdays, I'm
> hoping we can get a customized price somewhere in the R150-R200 range,
> since all we need is the space, cost of electricity, internet usage, and
> maybe one of the pcs for brackets/ games on pc.
>
> The parking is free as well.
>
> If we get a decent price per month, we might want to find out what the
> price is for non-regulars just for the day.
>
> We don't have to switch venues, but do think we should at least give it
> like a month trial or something to see if we like it better.
>
> Travel wise it's definitely better for me.
>
>
>
> Plus more new dudes for GB to troll and LB to lose to.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I see Makro is giving a good deal.
> A PSTV and a PS4 controller for 2k.
> Hmmm.... Christmas present methinks.
>
> On 17 Nov 2014 15:29, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> f u
>
> I agree with this 99% because I don't like u
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:26:28 +0200
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Jeeva and CTS had a symbiotic relationship for a long time. He advertised
> his venue as the GamerNET house. After a while, it seemed as if we were
> the only ones gaming there. There were times when he used CTS as a way of
> advertising GamerNET. I don't think anyone had and issue with that. But
> as was mentioned many times before, if he's not interested in running a
> Gaming venue any longer, he should just let us know.
>
> My R200 (fuck y'all broke ass niggas :p)
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:55 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> yes
>
> I agree with manase 100%
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 14:32:03 +0200
> Subject: Re: CTS community mail
> From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> I feel we should not burn bridges with Jeeva.
> We can use both venues like Nick is suggesting.
> Jeeva is convenient for me for obvious reasons, it's closer, his mom
> adores us and Internet is free whenever we are able to use it. Kamimodo can
> be used as a tournament venue or whenever guys feel like having a slight
> change of scenery.
>
> That's my 2 cents.
>
> On 17 Nov 2014 12:33, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I dunno what to say about Jeeva.
> I know this.
>
> He wants us there. He won't want us to leave. He lacks communication.
>
> Here's what I have to say.
>
> I like Kamimodo, but Jeeva's is nearer.
> Jeeva is lighter on the pocket, but we have to deal with bs.
> Kamimodo is more expensive, but the exposure is awesome.
>
> In my opinion, the best way to deal with this diplomatically, would be to
> ask Jeeva if there will be any meetings and shit in the week, and then
> relocate for that weekend.
> If there's no-one at Jeevas, have a session there instead.
>
> That way, we can keep the communication on the level, and let both parties
> know how we operate.
> Whoever needs us the most, will make the most effort.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
>
Other related posts:
