[CTS] Re: Ubuntu Review

  • From: cuffy10 <cuffy10@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: computertalkshop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 12:01:11 -0700

cuffy10 wrote:

Russ Blakeman wrote:

That's pretty cool - didn't know error 404 page not found was informative
LOL




Try reading between the numbers or the three fingers I'm holding up !!!!!!!!!!!!! 


(I'm not using the pinky)







This is weird.......... I wonder if this will work ?


Matthew Thomas » Blog Archive » My first 48 hours enduring *Ubuntu* 5.04 <http://mpt.net.nz/archive/2005/04/11/ubuntu>
But *Ubuntu* is still rife with design flaws, some of them severe. This is not a
*review*. Nor is it a list of the most important design flaws in *Ubuntu*. *...*
mpt.net.nz/archive/2005/04/11/*ubuntu* - 37k - Cached <http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:sQBTDu7Z0WsJ:mpt.net.nz/archive/2005/04/11/ubuntu+ubuntu+review&hl=en> - Similar pages </search?hl=en&lr=&q=related:mpt.net.nz/archive/2005/04/11/ubuntu>

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. computertalkshop
  3. Archive
  4. 07-2005