[ciphershed] Re: Mumble with Jos: Saturday at 13:00 GMT+0
- From: Stephen R Guglielmo <srguglielmo@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 10:50:38 -0400
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 6:12 AM, Niklas Lemcke - 林樂寬
<compul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Regarding the mumble meeting:
>
> It has been suggested that the PMC will not have a chair for a longer
> period of time, but rather that the chair changes from meeting to
> meeting. I second that thought. Bill earlier (on IRC) suggested that I
> organize the first meeting, which I would GLaDly do. However, if anyone
> else feels they or someone else should do it, that's just as good.
>
> I tried to summarize the points that will have to be discussed, so that
> everyone can get informed before the meeting and have an opinion / some
> information. I suppose the list is still not complete, so please add to
> it.
>
> Here it is, in chronological order:
>
> ## precedure related topics ##
> * method of voting
> * have Jos explain the nature of his foundation, and the intended
> nature of collaboration with the CipherShed Project
> * appoint QA Team members
> * define a protocol to be followed for merges to the codebase (PMC vs.
> QA Team)
> * decide how to accept new contributors
> * warrant canary solution
> * Voice chats vs. IRC / mailing list discussions
> * contact address (listaddress vs. @ciphershed.org)
> * hopefully give Jos the go-ahead for funneling all them people
> towards the CipherShed Project, and simultaneously discuss whether he
> should officially question the security of Protectorion on twitter
>
>
> ## code progress related topics ##
> * signing / tagging of commits (related to merge-protocol)
> * who does binary creation signing? Multiple persons for comparison?
> * estimate date for first rebranded release, as well as what is
> supposed to be included
> * decide what should be included in second 'bugfix-release', and try
> to estimate a timeframe / workload
I pretty much agree with everything here. I don't think we should have
a "dedicated chair," but a revolving chair who runs meetings. As for
the topics above, I think that's pretty much exactly what we need to
address.
Other related posts:
