[ciphershed] Re: First YouTube warrant canary?

  • From: Kyle Marek <psppsn96@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 14:29:33 -0400

On 06/09/2014 02:24 PM, Stephen R Guglielmo wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Kyle Marek <psppsn96@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Well that's kinda what i'm saying, but without driving to meet people. all
>> you have to do is get in a skype call or something and you can see right
>> there who you're talking to.
> Yeah, that'd work. Obviously I can't drive from the US to Taiwan,
> haha. Technically, you're not supposed to transfer keys over unsecure
> means (the internet) anyway. NITM attacks: NSA-In-The-Middle ;-) But I
> suppose because we're so distributed around the world, that's
> something we'll have to manage with for now.
>
> BTW, your top-posting is driving me nuts :-P
>
I was sure that would make someone mad but I didn't think that's how i
should be doing it when the quote is just building and building. Should
I be removing the quotes inside the quote and just leave it as the last
message?

Well anyway, i thought that since you're NEVER transferring your private
key, that this is safe and the public key could never change otherwise
communications wouldn't work. Like think about it, a tampered public key
doesn't correspond to your private key, as in, things wouldn't say "Good
signature from" or encrypted things couldn't decrypt at all. So since
they can't tamper with the private key at the same time, i don't see
anything wrong with it; i thought this thinking is by design.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At the time of sending this message, I have not been contacted by
any government official or worker regarding my participation in
CipherShed or any related project. I have not been asked to supply any
information to them that may be used to impersonate me nor have I been
asked to aid the government or it's officials or workers in modifying
part of CipherShed or any related project. I am not aware of any of my
property or anything regarding me being bugged, searched, or compromised
in any way. Anything that accepts PGP encryption or signing should have
been cryptographically secured with my PGP key.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Other related posts: