--- Jeffrey McGrew <JMcGrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > For me, it's not 2D vs. 3D. It's line-based vs. > object-based. > My sentiments exactly. Though most of our output is conventional 2d material, that will hopefully change. Since I'm working [freelance] for a design build concern, the drawings are primarily for our use and the 3D object with attributes makes the most sense. BTW, we're using Revit as well and I cancelled my personal subscription on the same day that they announced their sale to Autodesk. But that's another rant... At any rate, I would prefer to direct my volunteer efforts toward 3D. Perhaps a code fork is in order? QCAD's FAQ also points out that since 2d and 3d software architectures are entirely different beasts, that they have no plans to pursue 3d... Best, John K. "I am not a committee..." __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com