Uh-oh, I think I started a scanning/proofing war. In my opinion, both are amazing opportunities, and I really am sorry to hear that scanning is so much less popular at the moment. It is like good book publishing, or in my field, excellent research reporting. Without the writers think of these like scanners), we can not have science move forward as they provide us with the research and the new knowledge about important topics. Journal editors (think of these like proofers) take this work, and ensure it is perfect so that what the writer provided is as elegant and as important as the writer had intended and that it says exactly what the writer was meaning to convey. Both scanning and proofing are equal and opposite ends of an amazing process that is well worth what both individuals provide and for many of us, is the most helpful way to get our jobs done (given that many other accessible formats are not as up-to-date) and bring us pleasure! I think personally, it is just a manner of personality. Scanners want to get all the new books out there they can to give us access, proofers want to complete the next step by making those books as fully perfect for us as they are for the general population. So, my guess would be that, if your personality is a nitpicky perfectionist (like me), you probably are a proofer at heart and if your personality is a go-getter, you are probably a scanner at heart! Happy almost Monday! Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: Evan Reese To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 10:19 PM Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Re: Volunteering for Bookshare I don't need to think about it. Just ask anyone who proofs my scans, I do quite a lot of preproofing. Evan ----- Original Message ----- From: Nimit To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 10:03 PM Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Re: Volunteering for Bookshare Well... You know, if you think about it, scanners have to do or should do some pre proofing because there are some things that proofers can't do. It all comes down to team cooperation which I have encountered good volunteers. I have not done bookshare work in a long time mainly because I am out of free time from education, activities and all that. In addition, some of us who proofread cannot afford scanning materials. JMO! Sent from my super iPhone On Apr 13, 2014, at 9:47 PM, "Evan Reese" <mentat1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Sharon: Glad to hear there are others like me who prefer scanning to proofreading. As I've said before, I know how it works, but still there's a kind of magic about making words appear, either spoken or in braille, from inaccessible pages. Proofreaders can't do that! And the fact is, as Roger rightly points out, we do need more scanners. Without us, there's nothing to proofread. I'm not dissing proofreaders. Far from it, as my Lissi is one of the best; and she hardly scans at all. But there's an imbalance of scanners to proofreaders, and I don't know what can be done about it. Evan ----- Original Message ----- From: Sharon To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 9:30 PM Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Re: Volunteering for Bookshare Yea, I’m the opposite. I’d much rather scan than proofread. Especially with the new standards for proofreading. I just don’t have the patience for it; I want to be scanning the next book. Sharon From: Kim Friedman [mailto:kimfri11@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 6:58 PM To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Re: Volunteering for Bookshare Hi Bob, I remembered telling a friend of mine what I was proofreading and she saying she’d go nuts if she tried to do that. I know there are people who are comfortable doing both scanning files and proofreading but I find the prospect of scanning intimidating, but proofreading I enjoyed, especially if I got to read something I was interested in. I’d get to read the book before anyone else at Bookshare did (I’m referring to fellow Booksharians and not to the admin. Staff.) I haven’t analyzed what makes some people prefer Scanning files and vice versa. I think there must be continuum of submitters who would rather do anything rather than proofreading to those like me. Regards, Kim Friedman. From: Bob W [mailto:rwiley45@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 3:21 PM To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Re: Volunteering for Bookshare Hi Christina. Sounds like you would take volunteering seriously. Great! That's what they need. I haven't volunteered for about a year because of arthritis. However, volunteering was one of the most challenging and interesting parts of my bookshare experience. You may find that different people consider certain hardware and software essential. I used Kurzweil extensively in my proofreading, and would deem it essential, but others might not. Another thing I found essential was communication with the person doing the scanning. I love good teamwork, and this fit right in perfectly. However, beware of volunteering as a proofreader: it could become addictive. Bob ----- Original Message ----- From: Christine Szostak To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 3:49 PM Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Volunteering for Bookshare Hi All, I am considering volunteering for Bookshare and have a quick question. My particular interest is in proof reading as I have done a fair amount of general proofing for students, peers, and colleagues and love doing it! As I am totally blind, I was curious if anyone here without any vision is a proof reader and how you deal with things like making sure paging is accurately matching the original hard-copy source and how you deal with things like knowing that bolding needs to be added without looking visually at the original source... I know how you check for these types of things with JAWS so I would know how to check whether they are present or not, but what I do not know is how to check whether they match the original text. Any advice or suggestions would be much appreciated! Have a wonderful week! Chris Christine M. Szostak, PhD Assistant Professor Department of Psychology Shorter University Rome, Georgia szostak.1@xxxxxxx If you are interested in a professional consultation for a vision loss related issue see: http://findingthevision.wikidot.com If you are in need of a professional consultation for general research/statistical related issues see: http://researchconsulting.wikidot.com If you are looking for professional proof reading or editorial review services see: http://researchconsulting.wikidot.com