[bookshare-discuss] Re: Volunteering for Bookshare

  • From: Christine Szostak <szostak.1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 22:45:40 -0400

Uh-oh, I think I started a scanning/proofing war. In my opinion, both are 
amazing opportunities, and I really am sorry to hear that scanning is so much 
less popular at the moment. It is like good book publishing, or in my field, 
excellent research  reporting. Without the writers think of these like 
scanners), we can not have science move forward as they provide us with the 
research and the new knowledge about important topics. Journal editors (think 
of these like proofers) take this work, and ensure it is perfect so that what 
the writer provided is as elegant and as important as the writer had intended 
and that it says exactly what the writer was meaning to convey. Both scanning 
and proofing are equal and opposite ends of an amazing process that is well 
worth what both individuals provide and for many of us, is the most helpful way 
to get our jobs done (given that many other accessible formats are not as 
up-to-date) and bring us pleasure! I think personally, it is just a manner of 
personality. Scanners want to get all the new books out there they can to give 
us access, proofers want to complete the next step by making those books as 
fully perfect for us as they are for the general population. So, my guess would 
be that, if your personality is a nitpicky perfectionist (like me), you 
probably are a proofer at heart and if your personality is a go-getter, you are 
probably a scanner at heart!
Happy almost Monday!
Chris
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Evan Reese 
  To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 10:19 PM
  Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Re: Volunteering for Bookshare


  I don't need to think about it. Just ask anyone who proofs my scans, I do 
quite a lot of preproofing.
  Evan

    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Nimit 
    To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 10:03 PM
    Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Re: Volunteering for Bookshare


    Well... You know, if you think about it, scanners have to do or should do 
some pre proofing because there are some things that proofers can't do.  It all 
comes down to team cooperation which I have encountered good volunteers.  I 
have not done bookshare work in a long time mainly because I am out of free 
time from education, activities and all that.  In addition, some of us who 
proofread cannot afford scanning materials.  JMO!  
    Sent from my super iPhone 




    On Apr 13, 2014, at 9:47 PM, "Evan Reese" <mentat1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


      Sharon: Glad to hear there are others like me who prefer scanning to 
proofreading. As I've said before, I know how it works, but still there's a 
kind of magic about making words appear, either spoken or in braille,  from 
inaccessible pages. Proofreaders can't do that!
      And the fact is, as Roger rightly points out, we do need more scanners. 
Without us, there's nothing to proofread.
      I'm not dissing proofreaders. Far from it, as my Lissi is one of the 
best; and she hardly scans at all. But there's an imbalance of scanners to 
proofreaders, and I don't know what can be done about it.
      Evan

        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Sharon 
        To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
        Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 9:30 PM
        Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Re: Volunteering for Bookshare


        Yea, I’m the opposite. I’d much rather scan than proofread. Especially 
with the new standards for proofreading.

        I just don’t have the patience for it; I want to be scanning the next 
book.

        Sharon



        From: Kim Friedman [mailto:kimfri11@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 6:58 PM
        To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Re: Volunteering for Bookshare


        Hi Bob, I remembered telling a friend of mine what I was proofreading 
and she saying she’d go nuts if she tried to do that. I know there are people 
who are comfortable doing both scanning files and proofreading but I find the 
prospect of scanning intimidating, but proofreading I enjoyed, especially if I 
got to read something I was interested in. I’d get to read the book before 
anyone else at Bookshare did (I’m referring to fellow Booksharians and not to 
the admin. Staff.) I haven’t analyzed what makes some people prefer Scanning 
files and vice versa. I think there must be continuum of submitters who would 
rather do anything rather than proofreading to those like me. Regards, Kim 
Friedman.


        From: Bob W [mailto:rwiley45@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 3:21 PM
        To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Re: Volunteering for Bookshare


        Hi Christina.

        Sounds like you would take volunteering seriously. Great! That's what 
they need.


        I haven't volunteered for about a year because of arthritis.

        However, volunteering was one of the most challenging and interesting 
parts of my bookshare experience.


        You may find that different people consider certain hardware and 
software essential. I used Kurzweil extensively in my proofreading, and would 
deem it essential, but others might not.


        Another thing I found essential was communication with the person doing 
the scanning. I love good teamwork, and this fit right in perfectly.


        However, beware of volunteering as a proofreader: it could become 
addictive.


        Bob

          ----- Original Message ----- 

          From: Christine Szostak 

          To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

          Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 3:49 PM

          Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Volunteering for Bookshare


          Hi All,

            I am considering volunteering for Bookshare and have a quick 
question. My particular interest is in proof reading as I have done a fair 
amount of general proofing for students, peers, and colleagues and love doing 
it!


            As I am totally blind, I was curious if anyone here without any 
vision is a proof reader and how you  deal with things like making sure paging 
is accurately matching the original hard-copy source and how you deal with 
things  like  knowing that bolding needs to be added without looking visually 
at the original source... I know how you check for these types of things with 
JAWS so I would know how to check whether they are present or not, but  what I 
do not know is how to check whether they match the original text. Any advice or 
suggestions would be much appreciated!

          Have a wonderful week!

          Chris

          Christine M. Szostak, PhD
          Assistant Professor
          Department of Psychology
          Shorter University
          Rome, Georgia
          szostak.1@xxxxxxx


          If you are interested in a professional consultation for a vision 
loss related issue see:
          http://findingthevision.wikidot.com


          If you are in need of a professional consultation for general 
research/statistical related issues see:
          http://researchconsulting.wikidot.com


          If you are looking for professional proof reading or editorial review 
services see:
          http://researchconsulting.wikidot.com

Other related posts: