[bookshare-discuss] Re: Volunteering for Bookshare
- From: "Kim Friedman" <kimfri11@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 19:44:29 -0700
Hi, Evan, I'm certainly not going to make rude remarks about submitters as I
have had the pleasure of collaborating with submitters. You're right, those
who submit manuscripts are definitely for those of us who want to read. As I
said, scanning intimidates me so I'm proud to know the deranged
perfectionists on the submitter side of the aisle. Regards, Kim Friedman.
From: Evan Reese [mailto:mentat1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 6:48 PM
To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Re: Volunteering for Bookshare
Sharon: Glad to hear there are others like me who prefer scanning to
proofreading. As I've said before, I know how it works, but still there's a
kind of magic about making words appear, either spoken or in braille, from
inaccessible pages. Proofreaders can't do that!
And the fact is, as Roger rightly points out, we do need more scanners.
Without us, there's nothing to proofread.
I'm not dissing proofreaders. Far from it, as my Lissi is one of the best;
and she hardly scans at all. But there's an imbalance of scanners to
proofreaders, and I don't know what can be done about it.
Evan
----- Original Message -----
From: Sharon <mailto:mt281820@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 9:30 PM
Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Re: Volunteering for Bookshare
Yea, I'm the opposite. I'd much rather scan than proofread. Especially with
the new standards for proofreading.
I just don't have the patience for it; I want to be scanning the next book.
Sharon
From: Kim Friedman [mailto:kimfri11@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 6:58 PM
To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Re: Volunteering for Bookshare
Hi Bob, I remembered telling a friend of mine what I was proofreading and
she saying she'd go nuts if she tried to do that. I know there are people
who are comfortable doing both scanning files and proofreading but I find
the prospect of scanning intimidating, but proofreading I enjoyed,
especially if I got to read something I was interested in. I'd get to read
the book before anyone else at Bookshare did (I'm referring to fellow
Booksharians and not to the admin. Staff.) I haven't analyzed what makes
some people prefer Scanning files and vice versa. I think there must be
continuum of submitters who would rather do anything rather than
proofreading to those like me. Regards, Kim Friedman.
From: Bob W [mailto:rwiley45@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 3:21 PM
To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Re: Volunteering for Bookshare
Hi Christina.
Sounds like you would take volunteering seriously. Great! That's what they
need.
I haven't volunteered for about a year because of arthritis.
However, volunteering was one of the most challenging and interesting parts
of my bookshare experience.
You may find that different people consider certain hardware and software
essential. I used Kurzweil extensively in my proofreading, and would deem it
essential, but others might not.
Another thing I found essential was communication with the person doing the
scanning. I love good teamwork, and this fit right in perfectly.
However, beware of volunteering as a proofreader: it could become addictive.
Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: Christine Szostak <mailto:szostak.1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 3:49 PM
Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Volunteering for Bookshare
Hi All,
I am considering volunteering for Bookshare and have a quick question. My
particular interest is in proof reading as I have done a fair amount of
general proofing for students, peers, and colleagues and love doing it!
As I am totally blind, I was curious if anyone here without any vision is
a proof reader and how you deal with things like making sure paging is
accurately matching the original hard-copy source and how you deal with
things like knowing that bolding needs to be added without looking
visually at the original source... I know how you check for these types of
things with JAWS so I would know how to check whether they are present or
not, but what I do not know is how to check whether they match the original
text. Any advice or suggestions would be much appreciated!
Have a wonderful week!
Chris
Christine M. Szostak, PhD
Assistant Professor
Department of Psychology
Shorter University
Rome, Georgia
szostak.1@xxxxxxx <mailto:szostak.1@xxxxxxx>
If you are interested in a professional consultation for a vision loss
related issue see:
http://findingthevision.wikidot.com
If you are in need of a professional consultation for general
research/statistical related issues see:
http://researchconsulting.wikidot.com
If you are looking for professional proof reading or editorial review
services see:
http://researchconsulting.wikidot.com
Other related posts:
