Sorry Kim. Lori's disappointment would almost make one not want to proof any more but I will. I just saw mine up there, and one I wanted to get some one else did and it went up fast. But again, it's a chance we take. Patti
--- Begin Message ---
- From: "Kim Friedman" <kimfri11@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 09:12:58 -0400
Hi, Patti, I think you meant your letter for Lori. I was sympathizing with her. Now in my case, my file was sent back to me because of missing page breaks (my screen reader seems to think they're there). I've worked almost a month on this file and I am pretty sure no publisher will step in with a book with my file name on it as it was published in the 1990's. Regards, Kim. P.S.: Sympathy or empathy is always appreciated. K. _____ From: Patti Johnson [mailto:pat1206@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, July 05, 2010 5:41 AM To: bookshare-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [bookshare-discuss] Hello Kim, I'm sorry, that would be a disappointment. Too bad you couldn't have known before you worked on that book but I guess that is the chance we take. But I would be disappointed too Yesterday I looked on the books page and there are books dating back to beyond a year ago that need proofing. I saw several that are held too, what is up with that I wonder, how come people aren't going to get their books? I let mine sit a month may be but I never would have waited much longer to proof it. That just wouldn't be fair. Unfortunately for me I didn't see but one or two up there that I'd would want to proof. But that's just me. Patti . Patti __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5251 (20100704) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5252 (20100705) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com
--- End Message ---