Actually, you can use doubletalk speech on your computer, when I had a computer that had an isa slot, I used a doubletalk pc card, which I still have. Rc systems still makes the doubletalk external, and access solutions makes the tripletalk pci and tripletalk USB, haven't tried those, but it's the same speech. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ibrahim Gucukoglu" <igucukoglu@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 4:26 PM Subject: [bookport] Re: a feature request > Hi. > > I like your point Richard. Honestly, this product doesn't replicate a > screen reader and I don't think ever will. A screen reader is on ones own > computer and can be customised accordingly to suit the work style of the > user. The BP on the other hand uses a completely different speech > synthesiser to most screen readers and therefore the annunciation of the > doubletalk speech synthesiser the BP and BC employ can not be guaranteed to > be the same as say JAWS. I think, although a good suggestion, it should be > put on the back burner for a while until a feasible method of trying out the > annunciation before the file were transferred could be employed in the > transfer tool. > > Just my take on things. > > Warmest, Ibrahim > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Richard Ring" <ring.richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 9:59 PM > Subject: [bookport] Re: a feature request > > > > Something I thought of here. When you are attempting to correct > > pronunciation, one issue you might run up against is the ability to test > > the results of your phonetic spelling. Using the transfer software, > > there is no good way to do that. Accordingly, it is altogether possible > > that you could come up with what you thought would sound correct on the > > Bookport, only to find that it does not. For example, the major screen > > readers do in fact provide a pronunciation dictionary, however before > > you have to accept any modification you might have made, you can test > > the results. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James Jolley > > Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 2:05 PM > > To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [bookport] Re: a feature request > > > > > > Hi, > > The way I imagine it to work would be that you set up the original > > spelling=20 > > of the word, then it's phonietic representation and then the transfer > > tool=20 > > just edits the spelling. Naturally it would only be useful for lessure=20 > > reading. > > > > So, skutchan becomes Skoo-con > > Get the idea? > > > > Best > > > > -James- > > ----- Original Message -----=20 > > From: "LARRY SKUTCHAN" <lskutchan@xxxxxxx> > > To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 7:25 PM > > Subject: [bookport] Re: a feature request > > > > > >> What would you do about finding text with the incorrect spelling > > though? > >> > >> > >>>>> james.jolley1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Tuesday, January 11, 2005 1:56:32 PM > >>>> > >> Hi, > >> > >> As I tried to point out a few months back, it wouldn't need to be in = > > =3D > >> the=3D20 > >> memory of the bp. You could set the dictionary up in the transfer tool > > so=20 > >> =3D > >> it=3D20 > >> substituted the list of words with your phonetic spellings > >> > >> -James- > >> ----- Original Message -----=3D20 > >> From: "Richard Ring" <ring.richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 6:52 PM > >> Subject: [bookport] Re: a feature request > >> > >> > >>>I could see some validity to this argument were it not for one > > extremely > >>> noticeable fact. The Bookport has been updated numerous times, both > > the > >>> software and the firmware; and each and every time, new features have > >>> been added. A pronunciation dictionary would be great, I simply > > doubt > >>> if the onboard memory could support it. =3D3D20 > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx=3D20 > >>> [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Arrigo > >>> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 9:26 PM > >>> To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx=3D20 > >>> Subject: [bookport] Re: a feature request > >>> > >>> > >>> James, that's simply not true. You seem to take a statement > > disagreeing > >>> with > >>> something as a shoot down. You seem to think that people who want to > >>> keep > >>> the product focused on it's purpose, to read and play files do not > > want > >>> any > >>> new features, which is incorrect. > >>> ----- Original Message -----=3D3D20 > >>> From: "James Jolley" <james.jolley1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 7:40 AM > >>> Subject: [bookport] Re: a feature request > >>> > >>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> Don't bother requesting features you end up being shot down for > > them. > >>>> You'll learn > >>>> > >>>> -James- > >>>> ----- Original Message -----=3D3D20 > >>>> From: "Ibrahim Gucukoglu" <igucukoglu@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 12:23 PM > >>>> Subject: [bookport] a feature request > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Hi. > >>>> > I am really getting to know my book port and am simply amazed at > > how > >>> much > >>>> > it can do. I have just been playing with the Book Port Spider > > which > >>> is > >>>> > priceless as I often listen to news on the bbcnews.com website. > >>>> > > >>>> > Anyway, a particular feature I would like in the transfer tool is > > a > >>>> > transfer CD option. This option would work when an audio CD was > > put > >>> in > >>> to > >>>> > the CD Rom drive. It would ask you what range of tracks you would > >>> like > >>> to > >>>> > copy on to the flash card similar to the daisy option. It would > >>> then > >>>> > encode them in MP3 format in a negligible bit rate such as 128, > > 164 > >>> or > >>> 192 > >>>> > and transfer the CD in to a music folder on the BookPort with the > >>> artist > >>>> > and album name as the folder name and the individual track names > >>> along > >>>> > with their numbers. > >>>> > > >>>> > I would like this feature as I am an avid fan of music and would > >>> like a > >>>> > simple and effective way of transferring my music without messing > >>> with > >>>> > freeware, proprietary or other software titles. > >>>> > > >>>> > Just a suggestion, any opinions warmly welcome. > >>>> > > >>>> > Warmest, Ibrahim > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>=3D20 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > >