[bookport] Re: Batteries
- From: "LARRY SKUTCHAN" <lskutchan@xxxxxxx>
- To: <bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:53:44 -0500
Not that much. That's probably what we'll do on the next generation.
>>> DogRiver@xxxxxxxx Thursday, December 22, 2005 1:36:38 PM >>>
I really hadn't meant to reopen the yes/no debate on rechargeable
batteries, I just wanted to know how much extra circuitry would really
be
involved.
Bruce
--
Bruce Toews
E-mail and MSN/Windows Messenger: DogRiver@xxxxxxxx
Web Site (including info on my weekly commentaries):
http://www.ogts.net
Info on the Best TV Show of All Time: http://www.cornergas.com
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, DanFlasar@xxxxxxx wrote:
> And of course, a big issue with rechargeable batteries is t hat
there isn o
> tactile way (unless you put a tactile mark on it (which isn't easy
> considering the close tolerances in battery compartments) there is no
easy way to
> distinguish between rechargeable and non-rechargeable batteries.
There are,
> however, other battery types availble, usually in special packs, that
could be
> used but they are generally harder to find.
>
>
Other related posts:
