Hi Christine et al, My understanding is exactly as others on the list have already commented - i.e. that it is not possible to obtain a clearance without being supported by a government agency (Catch 22 - my favourite book btw) and that depending on the level of clearance, it can take months to obtain and costs an awful lot of money. I don't believe many agencies would put out fake job ads in order to attract candidates with security clearance, however it is possible. If I personally wanted to attract these people for a tender or a specific client, I would make that clear in the ad so as not to mislead. We have a number of clients, particularly in Canberra, which approach recruitment agencies specifically to find candidates with current clearances - this is because they need people urgently and cannot wait for clearances to come through, i.e.. the work is urgent. These are often consultancies which have won tenders for large pieces of work and then do not have sufficient staff to fill the individual roles. It is frustrating that perhaps in many cases, these departments don't foresee this work needing to be done, and therefore recruit earlier with a view to getting the individual cleared in time for the commencement of the project. However, even if they do make arrangements in advance, would jobseekers sit around for up to 8 months, waiting for a clearance and not take other opportunities if they came up? The answer is, unless extremely rich and working for love not money, no. There must be hundreds of situations where a government agency has put someone through clearance, only to find that they have accepted another job in the meantime, so leaving them with no other option than to look for those with a "current clearance". It is also frustrating for us as recruiters - the only way I have got around this in the past (and this does of course depend on the sensitivity of the work) is to suggest that a general police check be conducted which takes 24 hours and that the individual then be chaperoned either for the duration of the project, or until the clearance comes through. This is very rarely possible but always worth asking. Please do bear in mind though, when speaking to recruitment agencies, that there is only so much we can do! We can make suggestions and advise, but if we push something too far with a client, we risk damaging that relationship which may result in us obtaining no further work from them which won't help anyone! Finally, in terms of how long a clearance stays valid, this depends again on the level. I think the only way around this is for the government to address security clearances in a similar way to the way they look at allocation of business visas for skilled people from overseas. They should assess where the needs are and then allow individuals to apply for their own clearance, and if necessary yes, the individual can pay their own way if not supported by a department for a particular job. The other option of course, is to take on a perm role in a department with a view to getting the clearance once in there but I know many of you who wouldn't consider that option! If there are alternatives, I would like to hear them too as it would make my job a million times easier! Cheers Anna P.S. sorry for the essay! -----Original Message----- From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of BIRTLEY-KENT,Christine Sent: Tuesday, 2 December 2003 1:53 PM To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: atw: Re: Security clearance closed shop I'd be interested in the answer to this. If, perhaps, we need to pay for our own clearance and so get into the 'closed shop', this may be a good way of ensuring a career future. If I get some good information, I will put it as an option on the 'between contracts' document I am about to publish. How to apply? Levels of clearance? Cost of obtaining clearance/s? Time it takes to get clearance/s? Likelihood of work at various clearance levels? Maybe Anna (or any other consultant on the list) could give us some advice from an employment consultant's perspective? ck -----Original Message----- From: Stevens, Garry [mailto:Garry.Stevens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]=20 Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 1:39 PM To: 'austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx' Subject: atw: Security clearance closed shop Hi All: I've recently seen several ads (or the same ad several times) for tw's with current security clearance. I'm wondering about the mentality of the employers behind these positions. Obviously, they restrict their potential pool to the presumably small number of writers with such clearance, which effectively creates a closed-shop.=20 The ads implicitly assume that there is a sufficient pool of unemployed people in this closed shop to satisfy demand, since there is an implication that clearance cannot be acquired in the same way that -- say -- my police clearance was acquired before I started my last two jobs in the health and welfare sectors: if you don't already have it, you can't get it.=20 Are these ads just fakes, placed because of whatever bureacratic requirements, but designed to remove all except those who have already been selected for the job?=20 Garry ************************************************************************ ** This message is intended for the named addressee(s) only. It may be confidential. If you receive this message in error please notify us immediately by return mail and delete the message (and any attachments). Neither the NSW Department of Community Services nor the NSW Department of Ageing, Disability & Home Care are responsible for any changes to this message, or the consequences of any changes to this message.=20 ************************************************************************ ** ************************************************** To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field. To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe" in the Subject field. To search the austechwriter archives, go to www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter To contact the list administrator, send a message to austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ************************************************** Notice: The information contained in this e-mail message and any attached files may be confidential information, and may also be the subject of legal professional privilege. If you are not the intended recipient any use, disclosure or copying of this e-mail is unauthorised. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this transmission together with any attachments. ************************************************** To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field. To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe" in the Subject field. To search the austechwriter archives, go to www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter To contact the list administrator, send a message to austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ************************************************** -- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis -- -- Type: application/ms-tnef -- File: winmail.dat ************************************************** To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field. To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe" in the Subject field. To search the austechwriter archives, go to www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter To contact the list administrator, send a message to austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx **************************************************