Oh your marriage isn’t fully accessible then where you get an announcement that you’re getting the look huh? Pat used to announce that to me for some reason. I wouldn’t think I would have done anything to get such a thing since I am such a dull bland and borring guy. But managed to get a few of them, well a lot of them actually. > On Mar 16, 2015, at 3:01 PM, Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Nope, only silence *LOL*. I speculate that there may have been a look shot at > me, but Little Man was not present when I brought the topic up to let me know > exactly what look I may hve gotten *LOL*. > > From: audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > [mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Thomas McMahan > Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2015 8:16 AM > To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Older Houses > > So she didn’t say something like “I don’t want to leave America” huh? > > Well I guess that is about the best treatment you could probably expect > concerning the topic as apposed to her suddenly discovering a talent for > throwing large objects or breakable objects at you *lol*. > >> On Mar 14, 2015, at 7:08 AM, Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx >> <mailto:lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> >> Well, I talked about the Tigers at first, but being that she is not a big >> baseball fan in the firstplace much less a sports fan the conversation did >> not go anywhere. So, I just jumped right into we should broaden our search… >> oh to say somewhere like um well let me think and then I just without >> warning threw Detroit out there *LOL*. She ignored me *LOL*. >> >> From: audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> [mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Thomas McMahan >> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 7:21 PM >> To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Older Houses >> >> Well you must withhold the words Detroit and winter when applied to >> Michigan, well at the first part of the discussion at least, or a halt will >> be called by her to that whole topic *lol*. >> >> You could start it very vaguely by say talking about American league >> baseball, although you have to figure out a way to move it along fairly >> fast, just fast enough that she won’t get bored with that since that topic >> probably really doesn’t interest her either. But the word winter must be >> out of there for a time, in fact if you can avoid that word entirely that >> would be a good idea. Let her be the one to bring that up, then you can >> blame it on her *lol*. >> >>> On Mar 13, 2015, at 3:11 PM, Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>> >>> How do you propose I begin this conversation then? *LOL* >>> >>> From: audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> [mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Thomas McMahan >>> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 3:17 PM >>> To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Older Houses >>> >>> Well of course you two will work together, but her initial instincts I >>> think will probably be good. >>> >>> But you can run this deal past her and see what she thinks. Do not >>> initially ask her how she likes winter times in Michigan, that would be >>> getting off to the wrong foot probably. >>> >>>> On Mar 13, 2015, at 12:44 PM, Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>> <mailto:lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hey if you can get me into Windows 10 if I buy the Detroit school building >>>> then I am sure you will have yourself a deal as far as I am concerned, but >>>> of course it will have to go through the boss and she is a harder sale. >>>> There have been houses that I have walked into the sunroom or the garage >>>> and was redy to buy, but she has balked. >>>> >>>> From: audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> [mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Thomas McMahan >>>> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 11:49 AM >>>> To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Older Houses >>>> >>>> 10 isn’t ready for prime time yet is it? Trying to get something before >>>> market ready? >>>> >>>> Well the plastic part that is definitely doable. >>>> >>>>> On Mar 13, 2015, at 10:32 AM, Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> <mailto:lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Windows 10 and some plastic over the openings where windows to the >>>>> outside use to be. >>>>> >>>>> From: audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> [mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Thomas McMahan >>>>> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 10:59 AM >>>>> To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Older Houses >>>>> >>>>> Windows 8 or 8.1? >>>>> >>>>>> On Mar 13, 2015, at 8:47 AM, Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>> <mailto:lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> How about windows, can I at least have windows in my school building. I >>>>>> would prefer to not think about the utility cost *LOL*. >>>>>> >>>>>> From: audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> [mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Thomas McMahan >>>>>> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 9:20 AM >>>>>> To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Older Houses >>>>>> >>>>>> The security in those old buildings may have already been stripped out, >>>>>> as well as the pipes and wiring and everything else that can be taken. >>>>>> But you would have a big place to live *lol*. Can you imagine the >>>>>> utilities? >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mar 13, 2015, at 7:44 AM, Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>> <mailto:lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I guess we will be packing up and moving to Detroit. I need to purchase >>>>>>> me a school building. That will be good, Amanda will get her square >>>>>>> footage she is looking for, her big kitchen i.e. the cafeteria, and >>>>>>> Little Man will have a gymnasium. As for me, I just need to be able to >>>>>>> access the roof and I can use that as a deck *LOL*. I have the guns and >>>>>>> ammo to live in the area I do believe *LOL*. I wonder if I could ge the >>>>>>> school system to throw in security or at least alarm system monitoring. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>> [mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Thomas McMahan >>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 2:08 PM >>>>>>> To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>> Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Older Houses >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why didn’t you tell us you lived in Chicago? Sounds very much the same >>>>>>> as it is up there. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey Josh, I just thought of another option. There are lots of houses >>>>>>> available in Detroit. Heck you can probably buy yourself a school >>>>>>> building there. That would be a big house for you. Utilities might be >>>>>>> a little high though. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mar 12, 2015, at 11:57 AM, BethAnn LaPresta (Redacted sender >>>>>>>> "bela28_02@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:bela28_02@xxxxxxxxx>" for DMARC) >>>>>>>> <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My house is in a neighborhood that is definitely considered "the >>>>>>>> hood". I refinanced in January at $130K and my payment is about >>>>>>>> $800/mo. My property taxes are spendy though, over $2K per year, so >>>>>>>> that adds almost $200/mo right there. They tossed 26 of my cottage >>>>>>>> style single detached homes on little 3900 sq ft. lots, so our >>>>>>>> cul-de-sac is very busy with all of us stacked up right against each >>>>>>>> other. But, living out west, things cost much more, it is shocking >>>>>>>> actually. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I could've purchased a 100 yr. old home where Heather lives in Ohio >>>>>>>> with about the same size lot for $60K, just to give perspective. The >>>>>>>> guy who got himself into trouble with my house paid $263K for it in >>>>>>>> 2006 when real estate prices were obscene out here. Because he was >>>>>>>> short selling the home, I was able to get it for just $110K in 2011. >>>>>>>> A house on my street has just gone up for sale and they're asking >>>>>>>> $200K for 3 bedrooms (and they are tiny), 2 baths with one car >>>>>>>> detached garage. So, if I need to sell, I should still be able to >>>>>>>> make a little. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thought I should explain my monthly payment since I was saying I >>>>>>>> didn't think the $600/mo. seemed like enough. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> From: Thomas McMahan <shadowmonstrosity@xxxxxxx >>>>>>>> <mailto:shadowmonstrosity@xxxxxxx>> >>>>>>>> To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 9:23 AM >>>>>>>> Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Older Houses >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Oh mine btw was $162, because we’re cheap! *lol*. Then it went down >>>>>>>> to $150 then down to $128, but again we’re cheap and live in a piece >>>>>>>> of s— house, but as Pat used to say, “it’s our piece of S— *lol*. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mar 12, 2015, at 10:12 AM, BethAnn LaPresta (Redacted sender >>>>>>>>> "bela28_02@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:bela28_02@xxxxxxxxx>" for DMARC) >>>>>>>>> <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I am not sure that $600/month figure is accurate. I just refinanced >>>>>>>>> at 3.25% and my payment is $800/mo. (this does include property taxes >>>>>>>>> and insurance though). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> From: Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx>> >>>>>>>>> To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 4:44 AM >>>>>>>>> Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Older Houses >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Amanda did some figuring using a mortgage calculator online and the >>>>>>>>> 120,000 house was going to run us roughly 600 something a month for I >>>>>>>>> want to again say it was 1700 sq. ft. We currently live in a 1100 sq. >>>>>>>>> ft. apartment and pay 714.00 a month. So, given the differences there >>>>>>>>> and the fact that we have nothing to show for it at the end of the >>>>>>>>> year is a little much in my book. So, if the 120,000 was going to be >>>>>>>>> 600 something it would go to reason that the 112,000 would be less >>>>>>>>> money than that. Now, as far as utilities go, Knoxville Utilitiy >>>>>>>>> Board (KUB) will give us high and low figures for the last 12 months. >>>>>>>>> The last 12 months is a good thing providing there has been someone >>>>>>>>> living in the house, but if the house has sat empty then the numbers >>>>>>>>> that KUB quotes are not in the least bit accurate. I really like the >>>>>>>>> idea of rolling insurance and taxes into the monthly payment so that >>>>>>>>> way at the end of the year or whenever land taxes are due we are not >>>>>>>>> hit with a big lump sum of money to pay. Sure it would be nice to >>>>>>>>> think that I could just put that money back each month and not touch >>>>>>>>> it, but the minute something needs to be paid for guess where the >>>>>>>>> land tax money goes that was being put bac into an account. If it is >>>>>>>>> figured into the monthly payment then for the most part the majority >>>>>>>>> of it will be paid throughout the year. The thing that really sucks >>>>>>>>> is that stinking PMI payment each month. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> From: audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>>> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>>> [mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>>> <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Thomas McMahan >>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 4:58 AM >>>>>>>>> To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>>>>> Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Older Houses >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I accidentally hit the send before cleaning up that mail darn it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Here’s another little exercise to work on. Lets say you guys decide >>>>>>>>> to go for this house. You should have a ballpark of the monthly >>>>>>>>> payment. Sit down and plot out a budget around it on one paper, as >>>>>>>>> well as a list of possible repairs to do on another list and their >>>>>>>>> costs. Yes a house payment can be cheaper than rent, but their are >>>>>>>>> other realities such as the taxes, and insurance. Are you going to >>>>>>>>> escrow your insuranc and tax payments into your house payment? Most >>>>>>>>> people do that and it usually works out well until they assess your >>>>>>>>> house taxes up and then you have to make up the short fall. Of >>>>>>>>> course if they assess them downward you get a chunk of money back in >>>>>>>>> the mail like my sister-in-law has done the past two years. I didn’t >>>>>>>>> escro my other payments. I deal with insurance as I would any other >>>>>>>>> utility, and we would do our taxes on our own. Because of that I now >>>>>>>>> pay my insurance once a year and it’s cheaper, and once the house was >>>>>>>>> paid for there was less entanglement with the bank. I even removed >>>>>>>>> the automatic withdraw for house payment because they double dipped >>>>>>>>> us a couple of different months, and didn’t have a very good >>>>>>>>> explanation as to why. So it put us into over draw land, which isn’t >>>>>>>>> a place you want to be. They did the same to my sis-in-law too and >>>>>>>>> she went in and practically threw a fit because she wasn’t working at >>>>>>>>> the time and didn’t have income yet. They refunded her money on that >>>>>>>>> one, but as she asked them, “now how am I supposed to pay the rest of >>>>>>>>> my bills? You think you guys are my only bill to pay?” Banks and >>>>>>>>> their computers can be sloppy sometimes. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Now when you do your budget here’s another game to play which may be >>>>>>>>> beneficial. Can you run your whole budget on one income? Everybody >>>>>>>>> that lives as a couple should do this whether renting or paying for a >>>>>>>>> house. Most of us find we can’t, but it is a nice goal. The guy we >>>>>>>>> had going along with us to check out houses etc and sort of pointed >>>>>>>>> and guided us along through the process gave us that little bit of >>>>>>>>> wisdom. As he said, what happens if Pat loses her job and can’t get >>>>>>>>> one very fast? Can you live on just your income alone, because if >>>>>>>>> you can get to that point, then you can start paying extra against >>>>>>>>> your house on it’s principle and have more paid off faster which is >>>>>>>>> good for the credit rating, but if you decide to move in 20 years you >>>>>>>>> are carrying less of a load thus will get more money back to leverage >>>>>>>>> against your next place should you decide to do that. Or you can >>>>>>>>> both pay some extra on house and car, then put the rest in the bank >>>>>>>>> against major repairs which are going to come even if you buy a house >>>>>>>>> that was built today, in 30 years you will have to had to replace >>>>>>>>> things, they just don’t build stuff that good anymore and sometimes >>>>>>>>> that includes homes btw. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Lots of decisions, but at least it looks like you guys aren’t just >>>>>>>>> jumping right and grabbing what shines in front of you which is good. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Btw, I don’t think our budget is currently within the lowest income >>>>>>>>> level of the house here at this time which would be Patti’s income, >>>>>>>>> although it’s not way above that amount. It is a good goal to work >>>>>>>>> for actually, so we will be able to start seriously working on this >>>>>>>>> place. Get a lot of little stuff done over time, then do a loan down >>>>>>>>> the road and fix the major stuff such as re doing the roof etc. I >>>>>>>>> don’t think I am going to lift the house and work on foundation, but >>>>>>>>> it would be nice to do actually. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> But it’s a good exercise to do. I would run it on your income Josh >>>>>>>>> because it is likely to always be there and Amanda’s income is the >>>>>>>>> variable one, it can be lower if she’s out of work, but can also be a >>>>>>>>> lot higher should land a great paying job. Drop in everything, >>>>>>>>> credit cards the whole deal, then figure out once you get to where >>>>>>>>> you’re going which angles to cover and get paid off in the budget. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I am guessing you guys have done some of this already though in >>>>>>>>> preparing for checking out the housing market and talking to lenders >>>>>>>>> because they are going to do roughly the same thing when checking >>>>>>>>> your credit etc. Especially if it’s a conservative bank. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Now I think I’ve completed all I was going to say. Took two e-mails, >>>>>>>>> but if I had been able to clean up the other one first it would have >>>>>>>>> fitted into one probably *lol*. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Instead you get two. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mar 12, 2015, at 3:34 AM, Thomas McMahan >>>>>>>>>> <shadowmonstrosity@xxxxxxx <mailto:shadowmonstrosity@xxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Wouldn’t worry about a house on market for 5 months. Most around >>>>>>>>>> here are on a year or so. To many deals fall through each time that >>>>>>>>>> happens that just adds more time that the house is sitting there. >>>>>>>>>> Age, is only a problem if the house hasn’t been kept up and >>>>>>>>>> modernized over the years. There are people who prefer older houses >>>>>>>>>> simply because they are more solid. The house I live in was placed >>>>>>>>>> here in 1922. Yes it came from somewhere else. The house next door >>>>>>>>>> is older and was also brought in here from another place too. >>>>>>>>>> Fairly common in a town that springs up by a railroad. I wouldn’t >>>>>>>>>> worry so much about that as apposed to how it’s fundamentally built, >>>>>>>>>> there are a lot of newer places that are likely to give you just as >>>>>>>>>> much trouble if not more. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Any house is going to have ongoing mantainence of some kind. Sided >>>>>>>>>> house are nice but siding fades over the years for example and >>>>>>>>>> eventually would need replacing. Wooden houses have their things >>>>>>>>>> that have to be done, and so would brick, but brick is the best >>>>>>>>>> option as far as I’m concerned accept maybe when a big earthquake >>>>>>>>>> comes, then I would favor a wooden house, but what are the chances >>>>>>>>>> of that huh? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I don’t know the market down there anymore so don’t know if that is >>>>>>>>>> a low ball figure on that house or not, but I can tell you it is >>>>>>>>>> larger than mine is and mine is two stories, but so is it’s price >>>>>>>>>> too. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Go through it with a fine tooth comb with the idea of what has to be >>>>>>>>>> fixed now, and then in the next 5 years and what would be ongoing >>>>>>>>>> over the years, I don’t think for the long term ongoing it will be >>>>>>>>>> much different than a 10 year old house verses the 60 year old >>>>>>>>>> house, but agin it is a matter of what would immediately have to be >>>>>>>>>> worked on. When was the house last occupied too? A house that >>>>>>>>>> hasn’t been occupied for a good while can have problems such as >>>>>>>>>> drainage because they haven’t been flushed etc. It sounds like you >>>>>>>>>> already have someone with you who knows how to examine a foundation >>>>>>>>>> well and give you an idea of what would have to be done and when >>>>>>>>>> which is good. Same with tuck pointing brick etc. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It may be sitting on market because folks think it’s to high also, >>>>>>>>>> but you are going to drop in a price and they will take it or leave >>>>>>>>>> it, or you both the buyer and seller will eventually come up with >>>>>>>>>> something in the middle, or the seller is going to have an empty >>>>>>>>>> house on their hands. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What heating and cooling does it have, and when was it installed too >>>>>>>>>> that is a factor, a 30 year old furnace is getting kind of old in >>>>>>>>>> this part of the world, but most of our furnaces are gas and they do >>>>>>>>>> have to work pretty hard for a good part of the year. Does it have >>>>>>>>>> any chimnies, and where do they run through the house. Ones that >>>>>>>>>> run through centers of houses on the surface are nice, but when they >>>>>>>>>> have to be worked on they are a lot more work. Of course where you >>>>>>>>>> live a lot of homes are electric heat and electric water heat, which >>>>>>>>>> is another thing to add to your check list, how old is the water >>>>>>>>>> heater and when will you be replacing that. A brand new house >>>>>>>>>> obviously you would get to wait a while before doing that, but >>>>>>>>>> chances are you would have to do it eventually, or have your price >>>>>>>>>> knocked down when you are selling it, or when your descendants are >>>>>>>>>> selling it. But that goes with any house again. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What neighborhood is it in? How accessible is it to you. Pretend >>>>>>>>>> Amanda had to leave town for a Month and start your math, what is >>>>>>>>>> easy to get to via walking etc. Maybe that isn’t a problem for you >>>>>>>>>> at this moment, but life can always hand you changes, and well, next >>>>>>>>>> thing you know, you are walking to the grocery store if you know >>>>>>>>>> what I mean. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Find out what their highest bills were for each utility in the last >>>>>>>>>> year it was occupied if you can, you need that in planning a general >>>>>>>>>> budget. I don’t know your property tax situation anymore, but here >>>>>>>>>> they just give an estimate from the seller, but the problem is, that >>>>>>>>>> if the sell lived in the house for a long time you might get a >>>>>>>>>> little surprise when the annual taxes come. Our’s wasn’t a surprise >>>>>>>>>> because the previous owner hadn’t lived or owned the house for to >>>>>>>>>> long. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So it becomes also a matter of do you get a house that you won’t >>>>>>>>>> have to do any work or as little work as possible on, verses one >>>>>>>>>> that may have to have some work done, or one that is a fixer upper. >>>>>>>>>> We bought a fixer upper, but when we bought it was a seller’s >>>>>>>>>> market, it definitely isn’t that nowadays, so we went for a house we >>>>>>>>>> knew we could likely get. Well the trade off is that it’s needed >>>>>>>>>> work done on it and still does actually, but likely we would at >>>>>>>>>> least get some money back when we sell it. Maybe not a lot but >>>>>>>>>> probably some when all is said and done, and of course the sell of >>>>>>>>>> this place could be the lverage to getting a better place. It’s >>>>>>>>>> probably what you parents did, if not them then your grand parents >>>>>>>>>> did, that is more the normal thing in history. Well up until >>>>>>>>>> recently where you have people who expect to buy a brand new house >>>>>>>>>> that is larger than what their parents owned as their first house. >>>>>>>>>> Well if it can be swung, go for it, but to me it’s a little >>>>>>>>>> unrealistic, well to my income level it is *lol*. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What appliances are already there, and how quickly do you think you >>>>>>>>>> will be having to replace say: stove, washer, or more of a bear >>>>>>>>>> dishwasher? What about cabinetry etc, is Amanda happy with that, >>>>>>>>>> having that done can also be expensive unless you have someone who >>>>>>>>>> works with you to give you a break. How much stuff will you guys do >>>>>>>>>> on your own for modifications verses having to hire outsiders. So >>>>>>>>>> yes the advantage of a new place is that you won’t have to do that, >>>>>>>>>> but I guarantee you will pay up front for that, but that is why >>>>>>>>>> newer houses don’t stay on market long. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So then it falls back to degree of work and mantainence that has to >>>>>>>>>> be done. >>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 11, 2015, at 9:41 PM, Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>> We are finding tons of older houses that we absolutely love. When >>>>>>>>>>> I say older I am talking 1950’s. I am struggling with this a bit >>>>>>>>>>> though because I am looking ahead, past when I am living there. Or >>>>>>>>>>> rather to the point that I am ready to not live there anymore. So, >>>>>>>>>>> when I get to the point of not wanting to live there anymore it >>>>>>>>>>> could be 10, 20, 30 or more years down the road, but I am sure >>>>>>>>>>> there will come a time that I am ready to move on. If this is not >>>>>>>>>>> the case and I stay there until I die then it is not a concern, >>>>>>>>>>> However, a 1950 house that I live in for 20 years will then be 85 >>>>>>>>>>> years old. I know the specific house that we are looking at has >>>>>>>>>>> been on the market for right about 5 months. So, what do you all >>>>>>>>>>> think, do you think I would have trouble selling an 85 year old >>>>>>>>>>> home? It is on the market for 5 months at the age of 65 years old. >>>>>>>>>>> It is right about 112,000.00 right now without negotiating a lower >>>>>>>>>>> price. Do you think I would be able to get my money back? If it is >>>>>>>>>>> not a major concern, the age of the house, then I will not let it >>>>>>>>>>> sway my decision, but taking into consideration that it is an all >>>>>>>>>>> brick rancher with over 1700 sq. ft. and it is almost 100,000.00 >>>>>>>>>>> and still on the market concerns me regardless how beautiful the >>>>>>>>>>> house seems right now.