[audio-pals] Re: Current Affairs

  • From: "Josh" <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 18:45:00 -0500

I am telling you what whoever can’t see this mess we are in needs to one as I 
said earlier quit drinking the Kool-Aid and 2 make an appointment with a 
psychiatrist to get on some meds *LOL*.  

 

From: audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of Thomas McMahan
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 5:44 PM
To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Current Affairs

 

That just brought up another thing.  They talk about the unemployment dropping, 
well the way they get that to drop is to not count the people who have given up 
looking for work.  So eventually the numbers get better.  Well they still have 
all of those people out there, so may as well send them to school for 2 years, 
that can kick the can down the road for 2 years.  If it was JTPA or something 
else like that they could only kick it down the road for a few months or so.  

 

So they do realize there’s an unemployed monster under the bed.

 

Also unemployment in minority communities has increased even more so under 
Obama.  

 

They also keep delaying the corporate pay outs for Obama care too, that is 
because if they exact them the economy would crash.  So they keep putting that 
off till now after Obama will leave office.  If the new congress cuts the 
funding structure of Obama care which is what they are wanting to do, Obama 
care will then funnel into Medicade.  So then the pressure will be on to expand 
Medicade’s funding.  Well that was done in the late 80s and it was a disaster.  

 

On Jan 22, 2015, at 1:37 PM, BethAnn LaPresta (Redacted sender 
"bela28_02@xxxxxxxxx" for DMARC) <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 

Saying that everyone should be "entitled" to free community college tuition is 
just a repackaged Obamacare for education.  Another subsidized program that the 
working class will pay for...in spades for generations to come.  Obamacare was 
touted as being affordable, you could keep your doctor, and you could keep your 
plan.  By-the-way, I had my existing insurance plan cancelled by my insurer (I 
was private pay then) because it didn't meet the Obamacare requirements.  If 
government is so good at creating things (instead of the marketplace), why does 
every new rollout of something "helpful" (ie Cash for Clunkers, Obamacare, 
etc)--end up creating a budget deficit?  I'm just askin'...

 

In case it isn't obvious, I am with you on this one Josh.  But then, hey at 
45--maybe I will go to college for a couple years on the government's dime and 
see if that gets me a "better" job...

 


  _____  


From: Josh <lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 11:24 AM
Subject: [audio-pals] Current Affairs

 

I am currently in a debate that is not going real well for the other person 
best I can tell, but I am a bit biased and I understand this since I am a 
participant in this debate. I probably have already stated my stance on this 
here once before, but nonetheless what do you all think about America’s 
Promise. My thoughts obviously are not party affiliated because the one that 
originally stated this was a Tennessee Governor who is a Republican. I can see 
if it was Obama only that generated this how it would be considered the party 
or the person. Anyways For the people that do not know, America’s Promise 
involves giving high school graduates 2 years of free college. I will go and 
get the post and you all can read it before giving me your feedback. He says 
someone is going to pay for this. I agree someone will pay, but I am thinking 
that they are not thinking pay the way I am thinking pay, but I also agree that 
someone will pay in order for this to occur, someone like the American people 
whether they take advantage of this free schooling or not. However, I hijacked 
the post, I know, me hijack a thred, that is ludicrous, but I did keep it 
relevant *LOL*. I argue that this will weaken the degrees, I argue that not 
everyone wants to go to college, I argue that employers are going to require 
more in order to get a job. What do you all think? Am I off base with this 
argument? Do you all have an opinion regarding this? I bring it here because I 
feel like Gary’s last post is starting to grasp at straws a bit and starts to 
take a different direction in defending what I asked him to defend. I look 
forward to hearing your all’s thoughts regarding this.   

 

 

Post:


 <https://m.facebook.com/brian.hudson.562?fref=nf&refid=52&__tn__=C> Brian 


Mr. President I'm sorry, but I had to pay for my college education along with 
everyone else I know who earned a college degree. Many of us have the student 
loans to prove it. If I had to pay for it then everyone should have to pay for 
it. 
College education is not free Mr. President someone will have to pay for it 
eventually. And I refuse to pay for anyone else's education because no one but 
myself paid for mine.
Nothing worth having comes easy or free it must be earned with hard work.

 

Responses:

 

Gary 

Progression...it has to start somewhere.

Like · Report · Yesterday at 12:54am

 

 

Ryan 

So if you buy, lets say, an xbox 360, at launch for 500$, and then next year 
they lower the price to 349$... do you write back to microsoft and the vendor 
demanding they raise the price back up... because freeloaders are now getting a 
free 150$ subsidy that you didn't get.

 

You can't move forward if your crippled by revenge thinking... that just 
because that opportunity didn't exist for you, it shouldn't exist for anyone.

Like · 2 · Report · Yesterday at 10:33am

 

 

Robert 

I don't think he heard you

Like · Report · Yesterday at 10:34am

Gary 

The President also mentioned if you're out of school with existing students 
loan payments, he wants to pass his budget to lower student loan payments across

the board.

Like

Report

Yesterday at 11:18am

 

Robert 

Also the free two years of community college was pioneered by none other a 
republican governor, Tennessee's own Bill Haslam

Like

Like1

Report

Yesterday at 12:02pm

 

Noah 

I'd rather pay to educate our fellow citizens and give them skill sets that 
will allow them to be productive in society than pay taxes that go to government

assistance. I too have a grotesque amount of student loans! I just feel like 
this is something that could actually lower the costs and taxes associated

with government assistance and unemployment. Also, as a parent of two, this 
will help tremendously to assure that my kids can go on to better theirselves

through higher education. Pay it on the front end and receive the benefits on 
the back end.

Like

Likes3

Report

Yesterday at 1:04pm

 

Stephie 

It is not free, they will be required to do community service hours with 
non-profit organizations, in exchange. It is a give~give situation. I have had

the opportunity of receiving grants, scholarships, having to pay out of my 
pocket, and getting student loans for my degrees. I don't have a hand out for

free education but have no problem giving back because I received. There are 
ways to get our student loan debts lowered, many, one being working with 
AmeriCore.

There are many options already, this just enhanced opportunities for the middle 
class who's parents make too much to qualify for fin. aid but don't make

enough to pay for education.

Like

Likes2

Report

Yesterday at 1:24pm

 

Me (Josh): 

The associate degree will be no better than a high school diploma in the future 
if this takes hold. This of course is just my opinion.

Edited

Like

Edit

5 hours ago

 

Gary 

Associate degree isn't really that much better than a high school diploma 
already. I think more people will have chance to get a bachelor's degree if two

years is already paid for. I think the incentive would be there for it. Btw 
it's not like if this passes everyone will instantly  have a associates 
degree...you

still have to maintain a certain grade average. You'll have to work for it.

Edited

Like

Report

4 hours ago

 

Tara 

called earning your degree

Like

Report

4 hours ago

 

Me (Josh):

This may be true, but flip the coin. What if a person doesn't want to go to 
college, what if they just want to graduate from high school and get a  job.

Now that  college is being made available for free, 2-years, does this mean 
that employers that ordinarily would not have required a degree are now going

to require a degree? If this is indeed the case, then we have now essentially 
further limited job availability, rather than promoted job growth. If you

do not think this is the case with employers wanting people that are going to 
work hard for them then tell me why because Gary pointed out that a person

will still have to work for their degree. Employers know this too and they have 
no reason not to raise the requirements if everyone has the opportunity

to go to school for free. Likewise the bachelor's degree will be weakened as 
well. Diversity is here for a reason.

Like

Like1

Edit

3 hours ago

 

Stephie 

I am working on my third college degree, I do not go to school for a job or for 
more money.. I go to school because I enjoy learning!

Like

Like1

Report

3 hours ago

 

Gary 

I think we all can agree furthering education for everyone in the future will 
better humanity and this country as a whole. There's a reason why the United

States ranks so low in education, because other counties who rank higher 
already offer these programs. Everyone has an opportunity to take advantage of

this...There's no age requirements, you just have to work for it. I think the 
whole argument if everyone does it it'll dumb down the value of a certain

degree is something manifested by fear. It's the same argument people have if 
you're against raising the minimum wage. People believe small businesses

will go under or prices will inflate..is completely untrue. 10 major cities in 
the U.S. has already adapted a higher minimum wage and four more states

are about to approve it. Those cities and states who already did it isn't 
collapsing, isn't inflating cost. All it's doing is building the economy. Same

will happen if you give people an opportunity for higher learning. Yes it'll 
drive competition, but that will equal better business and better pay. Better

pay will mean more taxes to collect for even better programs for this country 
to benefit from.

Edited

Like

Report

2 hours ago

Write a comment...

 

Other related posts: