If they properly prepare the younger generations while they are in the K-12 grades then they will be smarter, they will be prepared to go to college, they will feel like they can go to college and succeed, they will be prepared to calculate someone’s change without the use of the cash register. Focus on these grades and then the poster “Gary” can quit screaming about America being the lowest ranked in education. College’s are having to dumb down the material they teach in order to have people graduate because they are not getting the skills they need in grade school. From: audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas McMahan Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 8:33 PM To: audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Current Affairs Depends on the district. Many urban or what they call inner city schools, it’s all a matter of just showing up and thats all they care about. There are of course some exceptions, but there are plenty that are just bad and people leave them or graduate and yet still don’t even sometime have basic skills yet they are expected to handle College? Granted the work load of a 2 year college is quite a bit less than a 4 year college, but still. On Jan 22, 2015, at 6:13 PM, Devin Prater <r.d.t.prater@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Well, as a senior in the last stages of.being programmed, I hate the way education is going. People tell me I have so much skill at writing, then throw little facts at me like I'm a dog after a bone. Those with easy memorization skills will always succeed. Why? School in all of its current forms is all about loading facts into the barrels and shooting them out in tests and assignments. That's what school is. From preschool to the masters and doctorate degrees in college. Sent from my iPhone On Jan 22, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Josh < <mailto:lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx> lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: You got it. The one’s that do not go to college are going to not get any kind of benefit out of this college plan. I failed to remind the one’s in the post if they have a G.E.D. they might as well just go ahead and get on Welfare because when this starts their G.E.D. is worthless. Gary claimed it was “fear”, but I think it is more common sense than anything. If employers can get employees with associate degrees, why waste their time with high school diplomas. I don’t know what fruit truck he got off of, but education has been being dumbed down for quite some time now. My Child and Family Studies Professor last semester was telling us the things she had to do in order to get her bachelor’s. In order to get her degree she claimed that she needed a Cehm 1 class and a Chem 2 class as well as some other classes that seemed extremely tough. Now, Chemistry is not even in the CFS Major requirements according to her. Use to kids were taught to think outside the box, now they are being told what to think. I probably shouldn’t ask this, but how much dumber can education get without just handing them out or purchasing valid degrees online. The problem isn’t with the fact everyone doesn’t have a degree, the problem lies with what the kids are being taught or rather what they are not being taught in Kindergarten through 12th grade. If you want to have a higher score country by country then focus on the area where they are required to get an education, not where it is optional. Side Note: The other day I took a citizenship test online, Amanda found it by Googling it. I am sure there are more questions to it, but the one I took I told Amanda she was about to get me deported *LOL*. I scored a 19 out of 25 so luckily I get to stay *LOL*, but she took it and scored a 24 out of 25. I thought it was one of the Facebook quizzes before we began and she said no. However, I told her she was about to be husbandless because you know they are monitoring those things *LOL*. From: <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [ <mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> mailto:audio-pals-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas McMahan Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 5:35 PM To: <mailto:audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> audio-pals@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [audio-pals] Re: Current Affairs Okay so some people don’t do College, will they get what is paid for college as a cash settlement? I doubt it. And if you bring in just about everybody you then have to lower the standard of what is being taught so that what would become probably the majority of students would be caught up. It’s lowest common denominator in education.. On Jan 22, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Josh < <mailto:lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx> lawdog911@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: I am currently in a debate that is not going real well for the other person best I can tell, but I am a bit biased and I understand this since I am a participant in this debate. I probably have already stated my stance on this here once before, but nonetheless what do you all think about America’s Promise. My thoughts obviously are not party affiliated because the one that originally stated this was a Tennessee Governor who is a Republican. I can see if it was Obama only that generated this how it would be considered the party or the person. Anyways For the people that do not know, America’s Promise involves giving high school graduates 2 years of free college. I will go and get the post and you all can read it before giving me your feedback. He says someone is going to pay for this. I agree someone will pay, but I am thinking that they are not thinking pay the way I am thinking pay, but I also agree that someone will pay in order for this to occur, someone like the American people whether they take advantage of this free schooling or not. However, I hijacked the post, I know, me hijack a thred, that is ludicrous, but I did keep it relevant *LOL*. I argue that this will weaken the degrees, I argue that not everyone wants to go to college, I argue that employers are going to require more in order to get a job. What do you all think? Am I off base with this argument? Do you all have an opinion regarding this? I bring it here because I feel like Gary’s last post is starting to grasp at straws a bit and starts to take a different direction in defending what I asked him to defend. I look forward to hearing your all’s thoughts regarding this. Post: <https://m.facebook.com/brian.hudson.562?fref=nf&refid=52&__tn__=C> Brian Mr. President I'm sorry, but I had to pay for my college education along with everyone else I know who earned a college degree. Many of us have the student loans to prove it. If I had to pay for it then everyone should have to pay for it. College education is not free Mr. President someone will have to pay for it eventually. And I refuse to pay for anyone else's education because no one but myself paid for mine. Nothing worth having comes easy or free it must be earned with hard work. Responses: Gary Progression...it has to start somewhere. Like · Report · Yesterday at 12:54am Ryan So if you buy, lets say, an xbox 360, at launch for 500$, and then next year they lower the price to 349$... do you write back to microsoft and the vendor demanding they raise the price back up... because freeloaders are now getting a free 150$ subsidy that you didn't get. You can't move forward if your crippled by revenge thinking... that just because that opportunity didn't exist for you, it shouldn't exist for anyone. Like · 2 · Report · Yesterday at 10:33am Robert I don't think he heard you Like · Report · Yesterday at 10:34am Gary The President also mentioned if you're out of school with existing students loan payments, he wants to pass his budget to lower student loan payments across the board. Like Report Yesterday at 11:18am Robert Also the free two years of community college was pioneered by none other a republican governor, Tennessee's own Bill Haslam Like Like1 Report Yesterday at 12:02pm Noah I'd rather pay to educate our fellow citizens and give them skill sets that will allow them to be productive in society than pay taxes that go to government assistance. I too have a grotesque amount of student loans! I just feel like this is something that could actually lower the costs and taxes associated with government assistance and unemployment. Also, as a parent of two, this will help tremendously to assure that my kids can go on to better theirselves through higher education. Pay it on the front end and receive the benefits on the back end. Like Likes3 Report Yesterday at 1:04pm Stephie It is not free, they will be required to do community service hours with non-profit organizations, in exchange. It is a give~give situation. I have had the opportunity of receiving grants, scholarships, having to pay out of my pocket, and getting student loans for my degrees. I don't have a hand out for free education but have no problem giving back because I received. There are ways to get our student loan debts lowered, many, one being working with AmeriCore. There are many options already, this just enhanced opportunities for the middle class who's parents make too much to qualify for fin. aid but don't make enough to pay for education. Like Likes2 Report Yesterday at 1:24pm Me (Josh): The associate degree will be no better than a high school diploma in the future if this takes hold. This of course is just my opinion. Edited Like Edit 5 hours ago Gary Associate degree isn't really that much better than a high school diploma already. I think more people will have chance to get a bachelor's degree if two years is already paid for. I think the incentive would be there for it. Btw it's not like if this passes everyone will instantly have a associates degree...you still have to maintain a certain grade average. You'll have to work for it. Edited Like Report 4 hours ago Tara called earning your degree Like Report 4 hours ago Me (Josh): This may be true, but flip the coin. What if a person doesn't want to go to college, what if they just want to graduate from high school and get a job. Now that college is being made available for free, 2-years, does this mean that employers that ordinarily would not have required a degree are now going to require a degree? If this is indeed the case, then we have now essentially further limited job availability, rather than promoted job growth. If you do not think this is the case with employers wanting people that are going to work hard for them then tell me why because Gary pointed out that a person will still have to work for their degree. Employers know this too and they have no reason not to raise the requirements if everyone has the opportunity to go to school for free. Likewise the bachelor's degree will be weakened as well. Diversity is here for a reason. Like Like1 Edit 3 hours ago Stephie I am working on my third college degree, I do not go to school for a job or for more money.. I go to school because I enjoy learning! Like Like1 Report 3 hours ago Gary I think we all can agree furthering education for everyone in the future will better humanity and this country as a whole. There's a reason why the United States ranks so low in education, because other counties who rank higher already offer these programs. Everyone has an opportunity to take advantage of this...There's no age requirements, you just have to work for it. I think the whole argument if everyone does it it'll dumb down the value of a certain degree is something manifested by fear. It's the same argument people have if you're against raising the minimum wage. People believe small businesses will go under or prices will inflate..is completely untrue. 10 major cities in the U.S. has already adapted a higher minimum wage and four more states are about to approve it. Those cities and states who already did it isn't collapsing, isn't inflating cost. All it's doing is building the economy. Same will happen if you give people an opportunity for higher learning. Yes it'll drive competition, but that will equal better business and better pay. Better pay will mean more taxes to collect for even better programs for this country to benefit from. Edited Like Report 2 hours ago Write a comment...