In article <58ea20b6e3bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bob Latham
<bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Did you recompile as Jim described to get 192?
I've got a very, very old 'Acorn'/ROOL (ex Norcroft) C complier which I
doubt would be any good.
Colin tweaked his code to suit my ancient (2010 IIRC) copy of the 'Acorn'
compiler suite. So you may be OK. If not, from my POV Jean-Michel would be
welcome to send you his altered version.
Our initial concern was to avoid user settings in case they put people off
or caused muddles. But I can easily make the choice a user option.
