Mon, 10 Jan 2011 23:41:56 +1100 Graeme Gill wrote: > Klaus Karcher wrote: > > Quote from ProfileMaker Documentation: > > "Perceptual Rendering Intent Option > > > Note: This corresponds to relative colorimetry in highlight areas and > > absolute colorimetry with shadow compensation in the remaining colors. > > Note: The default and recommended setting is Neutral Gray. > > Hi Klaus, > thanks for the clearer explanation. It's difficult to believe > that the "Neutral Gray" option gives results that people actually find > useful though, particularly for relative colorimetric. The peoples are demand this for BW printing. I have two troubles with users of "blue" cheap photopapers. The profiles from Profile Maker works much better for them. The relative intent in ArgyllCMS profile was unacceptable on bluish papers. I had return money for profiling. > I can understand > using this sort approach as a hybrid "absolute colorimetric" type intent, > but the results with typical source colorspaces (ie. sRGB with a D65 > white point) could only look peculiar - very blue looking neutrals > until they switch to the D50 paper white near white ! > > > For example, if B/W and color images are positioned next to each other > > in reproduction, the Paper Gray Axis option should be selected to > > achieve the same impression in the neutral tones both in the B/W images > > and in the color images. > > But side by side proofing should use absolute colorimetric, not relative! There is a problem: if one select the absolute colorimetric intent while printing, the clipping in highlights is happen. > If someone wants to achieve a similar effect using Argyll, they can do so > by creating a device link. Look at the -w option combined with > absolute colorimetric <http://www.argyllcms.com/doc/collink.html#w>. Most of end users of ArgyllCMS profiles in my practice can't deal with device links.