Graeme, thank you for your response. I am currently using dispcalGUI with Argyll, I hope I can ask questions here that refer to the usage of Argyll with dispcalGUI. Have a few follow up questions: (1) dispcalGUI does not report the max and average fit error (or any other report) when creating a correction matrix. Can ccxxmake (I am assuming command line usage) which you referred to report on an EXISTING correction matrix (by reading it's values and reporting) or does it only report after it has just freshly created a new correction matrix ? (2) understood, thank you (3) To my knowledge, there are different chromatic adaptation methods such as Bradford, Cat02 (from CIECAM02), von Kries etc. I was just asking b/c in other software it is possible to change the chromatic adaptation method and see if you get better results for a particular display. But, I always had excellent results with Bradford (CAT02 was better on some displays with specific options), so I was just asking if I missed a feature of your fantastic software. (4) yes, this is a little bit unclear to me, I'm just trying to understand the options and possibilities of the ADVANCED GAMUT MAPPING menu (in dispcalGUI): By default in dispcalGUI, under the Advanced Gamut Mapping Options menu, the source profile is set to sRGB.icm. I am not sure if it actually maps to sRGB if I do NOT make any selections in any of the options in the Advanced menu (Gamut mapping for perceptual, Gamut mapping for saturation, etc.)... ? What would I select (or not select) if I want to calibrate my wide gamut display to the widest gamut possible (not restrict to sRGB) ? If I do want to map my display to sRGB (or any other color space), what would be good, default selections for the options "Gamut mapping for perceptual intent", " Gamut mapping for saturation intent" and "Default rendering intent for display device profile" ? I am unsure what to select here... Thank you for all your work. - Mike Nagel -----Original Message----- From: argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Graeme Gill Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2012 8:01 PM To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [argyllcms] Re: General Questions Michael Nagel wrote: Hi, > (1) Is there a way to see a visual report of a correction matrix > (similar to a profile verification report) ? ccxxmake reports the max and average fit error. Would it really be useful to separate out this aspect as a verification function ? > (2) Can this program write into the hardware LUT's of an Eizo CG275W ? No, there is no current capability to write to specific display hardware. I'd be pleased to add this, but no-one has seen fit to provide me with the displays to RE and test, and I don't currently have the budget to buy dozens of high end displays myself, and give the resulting code away. > (3) How can I change the adaptation method (Bradford, Cat02 etc.) ? Which adaptation do you mean ? What benefits do you see in changing this ? The ICC white point adaptation is hard coded as Bradford in icc/icc.c, icmChromAdaptMatrix(). cLUT profiles B2A gamut mapping tables will use CIECAM02 white point adaptation whenever a gamut mapping algorithm using CIECAM02 is selected. > In all my verification reports I see that the adaptation method was always Bradford. Yes. It seems to be the accepted best simple (ie. 3x3 matrix) white point adaptation algorithm. > (4) Can somebody advise on the ADVANCED GAMUT MAPPING OPTIONS ? What > would be standard default values to map to a gamut ? I'm not sure what you mean. When creating profiles with gamut mapping, there is a choice of pre-defined gamut mappings - see <http://www.argyllcms.com/doc/collink.html#i> for instance. If you want to alter the gamut mapping details beyond this, then you would need to alter the source code, ie. see the gammapweights tables in gamut/gammap.c. Beyond that, you'd need to code your own algorithms. Graeme Gill.