[argyllcms] Re: Display Calibration Hardware Capabilities

  • From: adam k <aak1946@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 19:54:39 -0500

I wonder how good / bad calibration / profile has to be in order for a
human eyes to notice that something is out of wack with a given
display. What all the numbers really mean?

A Kielcz

On Feb 5, 2012, at 7:16 PM, "János, Tóth F." <janos666@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I guess at the end of the day this speaks for the custom EDR/ccss files.
> They can't cause too much trouble but we can assume a CM/i1Pro gives
> better approximation of the particular display than an EDR file of a
> different display (the display-to-display variation is probably higher
> than the absolute error of these spectros), unless you work with the
> very same displays what X-Rite used for creating the EDR files...
>
> If one of the EIZO or NEC whic X-Rite used happen be on my desk
> (///OFFTOPIC/// there is a chance for both because I happened to be
> some sort of a display „reviwer” --in my little country, there is no
> chance to borrow Jeti or Minolta stuff even for this „mighty” task,
> LOL-- and I can ask for specific models, so why not pick those...?
> :D), I will be able to compare the i1d3 results with the X-Rite EDR
> and my custom ccsss files to get an idea about the final deviations.
>
>> The impression I get is that since
>> the basic filter response is closer to the standard observer anyway,
>> the calibration for a particular display is somewhat less critical
>> than the consumer colorimeters that preceded it.
>

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. argyllcms
  3. Archive
  4. 02-2012