I have no doubt that I'm confused about the profiling end of things, as I know little about that. There must be some complex stuff going on under the hood, as I did notice that the XYZ values in the Argyll-generated ICM profile are different than the ones in the base profile, and I also noticed that the gamma ramps described by the calibration table stored in the Argyll-generated ICM profile vary slightly from what I dumped from the video card LUT. On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Benjamin Shadwick wrote: > > > As for editing the XYZ values, I wouldn't know what I'm doing or why I > > should do it. If the argyllcms-generated profile has calculated the XYZ > > values based off of the LUT data, then wouldn't that be more appropriate > to > > use than the XYZ values from the generic profile provided by the monitor > > manufacturer for my model of monitor? > > I suspect you are confusing calibration and the profiling. > The calibration table will simply be stored in the profile. > > The Argyll profile is created by looking up the colors in > your original profile (ie. sampling the original profile > matrix model). > > Graeme Gill. > > -- - Ben S.