04 Feb 2012, 05:41 Benjamin Shadwick wrote: > > There must be some complex stuff going on under the hood, as I did notice > that the XYZ values in the Argyll-generated ICM profile are different than > the ones in the base profile, and I also noticed that the gamma ramps > described by the calibration table stored in the Argyll-generated ICM profile > vary slightly from what I dumped from the video card LUT. > I've advice You to tune XYZ values in Argyll-generated ICM by Profile Inspector exactly for this reason. You can change XYZs (and gamma too) to their original values. This can improve the profile tolerance a bit. > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Graeme Gill <graeme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Benjamin Shadwick wrote: > > > As for editing the XYZ values, I wouldn't know what I'm doing or why I > > should do it. If the argyllcms-generated profile has calculated the XYZ > > values based off of the LUT data, then wouldn't that be more appropriate to > > use than the XYZ values from the generic profile provided by the monitor > > manufacturer for my model of monitor? > > I suspect you are confusing calibration and the profiling. > The calibration table will simply be stored in the profile. > > The Argyll profile is created by looking up the colors in > your original profile (ie. sampling the original profile > matrix model). > > Graeme Gill. > > > > > -- > - Ben S. > >