NOTICE TO ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT:.[NATIONALS OR CITIZENS]ARE NOT REQUIRED.TO SHOW
IDENTIFICATIONTO A POLICE OFFICER!... The Police Officer swears by Oath to
uphold the United States Constitution as an Officer Of Law. Supreme Court
Decisions are Considered the Law of the Land In Regards to Constitutionally
Protected Rights, and they cannot be interpreted, or re-interpreted, as they
are 'stare decisis' (already reviewed and clearly described as Law)..SUPREME
COURT CASE:.
Kolender v. Lawson (461 U.S. 352, 1983) in which the United States Supreme
Court ruled that a police officer could not arrest a citizen merely for
refusing to present identification.
There is no such thing as
"Failure to identify"
YOU CAN SUE THE POLICE FOR AN ILLEGAL ARREST AND RESIST ARREST WITH IMPUNITY!..
"An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be
restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself
as he would in repelling any other assault and battery."(State v. Robinson, 145
ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).
"Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the
person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be
resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense."(State v. Mobley, 240 N.C.
476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).
"One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may
where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an
offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he
may have submitted to such custody, without resistance."(Adams v. State, 121
Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910).."These principles apply as well to an officer attempting
to make an arrest, who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof
by the use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private
individual who unlawfully uses such force and violence."Jones v. State, 26 Tex.
App. I; Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75; Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903.
“Federal law & Supreme Court cases apply to state court cases.”
Howlett v. Rose, 496 U.S. 356 (1990)
.
